人机协同阐释:人工智能时代经济思想史研究的新范式
作者简介:赵雷,东北财经大学经济学院讲师(辽宁大连 116025);刘子阳,东北财经大学经济学院硕士研究生(辽宁大连 116025)。
基金项目:
本文为国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国经济学自主知识体系建构的方法论研究”(23&ZD129)的阶段性成果
摘要: 人工智能浪潮与构建经济学自主知识体系的时代需求,给经济思想史的传统研究范式带来了深刻的挑战。研究诊断发现,学科虽已确立“知识生产史”的宏大纲领,但传统精读方法固有的“结构性失明”“过程性失察”与“经验性失语”三大病理,造成了学术理想与研究能力之间的深刻鸿沟。为应对此困境,有必要系统构建一种“人机协同阐释”新范式。该范式以研究者智慧为主导,通过“问题建构—模式发现—意义阐释—循环深化”的循环探究流程,深度融合人工智能的远读计算与学者的精读阐释。辅以“三角互证法”确保阐释的稳健性,新范式力求整合计算客观性与阐释主体性,致力于将“知识生产史”纲领从思辨构想提升为可检验的实证科学。研究展示了新范式如何通过一系列前沿议程,推动经济思想史转型为更“厚重”的历史科学,并为构建自主知识体系的时代使命提供关键的方法论支撑。
Human-AI Collaborative Hermeneutics: A New Research Paradigm for the History of Economic Thought in AI Era
Abstract: The surge of Artificial Intelligence and the contemporary imperative to construct an autonomous knowledge system for economics pose a profound challenge to the traditional research paradigm in the history of economic thought.This paper diagnoses that although the discipline has established the ambitious program of a “history of knowledge production,” three inherent pathologies of the traditional close-reading method — “structural blindness,” “procedural oversight,” and “empirical aphasia” — have created a profound gap between scholarly aspirations and research capabilities.To address this dilemma,this paper systematically constructs a new paradigm:“ Human-AI Collaborative Hermeneutics.” Guided by the researcher's intellectual leadership (Phronesis),this paradigm deeply integrates AI-driven computational “distant reading” with the scholar's “close reading” interpretation through an iterative inquiry cycle:“problem construction,pattern discovery,meaning interpretation,and cyclical deepening.” Reinforced by a “triangulation method” to ensure interpretive robustness,the new paradigm endeavors to synthesize computational objectivity and interpretive subjectivity,aiming to elevate the “history of knowledge production” program from a speculative concept to a testable empirical science.Finally,the paper demonstrates how this new paradigm,through a series of cutting-edge agendas,can transform the history of economic thought into a more robust and substantial historical science and provide crucial methodological support for the mission of building an autonomous knowledge system.