Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 52 Issue 5
May 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Jingkun CHEN. Physicalist Panpsychism: The Combination Problem and Phenomenal Bonding Solution[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(5): 30-38. shu

Physicalist Panpsychism: The Combination Problem and Phenomenal Bonding Solution

  • As a view compatible with physicalism, contemporary panpsychism takes consciousness or mentality as a fundamental and ubiquitous property in the universe. Panpsychism faces a notorious “combination problem” when it holds that human consciousness can be somehow constituted by more fundamental consciousness. Philip Goff raises a so-called “subject-summing problem”: how do subjects and their experiences add up so as to constitute further subjects and their experiences? Goff suggests a possible solution by “phenomenal bonding relation”, but he doubts whether we can form a positive concept of this phenomenal relation, while George Miller gives a positive phenomenal bonding relation by co-consciousness. I will argue that the concept of phenomenal relation may be incoherent, it cannot function to bond as it was supposed to, and the macro-consciousness can hardly be explained by phenomenal bonding.
  • 加载中

Article Metrics

Article views: 1837 Times PDF downloads: 6 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(6)
  • Abstract views(1837)
  • HTML views(246)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Physicalist Panpsychism: The Combination Problem and Phenomenal Bonding Solution

        Abstract: As a view compatible with physicalism, contemporary panpsychism takes consciousness or mentality as a fundamental and ubiquitous property in the universe. Panpsychism faces a notorious “combination problem” when it holds that human consciousness can be somehow constituted by more fundamental consciousness. Philip Goff raises a so-called “subject-summing problem”: how do subjects and their experiences add up so as to constitute further subjects and their experiences? Goff suggests a possible solution by “phenomenal bonding relation”, but he doubts whether we can form a positive concept of this phenomenal relation, while George Miller gives a positive phenomenal bonding relation by co-consciousness. I will argue that the concept of phenomenal relation may be incoherent, it cannot function to bond as it was supposed to, and the macro-consciousness can hardly be explained by phenomenal bonding.

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return