“中央出题—地方自选”：城市治理政策何以反制政策效能层层衰减

谢伊云

English

引用本文: 谢伊云. “中央出题—地方自选”：城市治理政策何以反制政策效能层层衰减[J]. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(6): 89-99. shu

Citation: XIE Yiyun. “Central Government Issues Policy and Local Governments Choose”—— How to Avoid the Gradual Decline of Policy Implementation[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(6): 89-99. shu

“中央出题—地方自选”：城市治理政策何以反制政策效能层层衰减

谢伊云

作者简介: 谢伊云，海南大学国际旅游与公共管理学院副研究员(海南海口570100)，南开大学中国政府发展联合研究中心研究员(天津300071)。;

基金项目: 本文为国家社会科学基金青年项目“‘党员下沉基层’背景下的社区治理共同体建设机制研究”（21CZZ008）的阶段性成果
中图分类号: D6

“Central Government Issues Policy and Local Governments Choose”—— How to Avoid the Gradual Decline of Policy Implementation

XIE Yiyun

CLC number: D6

摘要: 近年来，以“中央出题、地方自选”的国家示范城市创建工作成为热潮，实现了中央政策效能在基层的充分发挥。研究表明，国家示范城市政策：（1）具有低模糊性、低冲突性与高弹性等政策属性，有利于减少地方政府政策执行的阻力；（2）提供了双重激励耦合地方政府的政策执行动机：一是为地方政府提供物质性激励；二是提高地方职能部门能动性、强化地方政府优化治理绩效的使命感。国家示范城市政策嵌入了中央对城市治理向标准化、精细化转型的意图，改变了国家政策执行的层级节制关系，激发了地方自觉，是中央阶段性、技巧性改善城市治理、规避政策效能减码的有效尝试。
- 政策执行｜城市治理｜示范城市｜地方政府
Abstract: Avoiding the gradual decline of policy implementation is a practical problem that remains to be solved in the academic and practical circles.In recent years,the creation of “national model cities” has become a new phenomenon of local governance.The central ministries and commissions have issued policies,and local governments below the provincial level have independently participated in,implemented and disseminated policies with high quality,realizing the full play of the effectiveness of the central policy at the grass-roots level.Through combing the 22 types of demonstration city policies launched by the central ministries and commissions from 2009 to 2020,the study found that the demonstration city policies have the policy attributes of low ambiguity,low conflict and high flexibility; At the same time,they provide “two-dimensional incentives” to couple the motivation of local government policy implementation,which not only ensures that local policy implementation can obtain external political,promotion or financial protection,but also pays attention to strengthening the internal perception of local government’s power status,role and mission.The national model city policy,through the mode of “Central Government Issues Poilicy and Local Governments Choose”,not only embeds the central government’s intention to transform the city to standardized and refined governance,but also changes the general bureaucratic relationship of policy implementation,endows local governments with freedom in policy implementation,activates local consciousness,and is a successful case of efficient policy implementation shown in practice.Future research can focus on the vivid city creation practice,and excavate the bureaucratic relationship and government action logic under the background of the implementation of model city policies from an empirical perspective.
- policy implementation,urban governance,demonstration city,local governmen
1. [1]
  郁建兴 , 黄亮 . 当代中国地方政府创新的动力：基于制度变迁理论的分析框架. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(02): 96-105.
2. [2]
  王烨，孟天广 . 横向权力结构与地方政府回应性：分职与协同. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(2): 103-114.
3. [3]
  陈国政 , 朱秋 . 现代城市治理动态机制研究. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(9): 86-95, 122.
4. [4]
  郁建兴 , 李琳 . 当代中国地方政府间关系的重构—— 基于浙江省县乡两级政府扩权改革的研究. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(01): 101-116.
5. [5]
  谢华育，杨万东 . 城市分隔治理的困境及其超越. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(11): 84-94.
6. [6]
  张传勇 , 蔡琪梦 . 中国城市职业多样性：事实、演进与政策含义. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(8): 45-58.
7. [7]
  张翔 . “行政共同体”：对城市政府结构化过程的一种解释. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(6): 67-77.
8. [8]
  吴晓林 . 城市基层治理的历史传统与现代化进程. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(9): 77-89.
9. [9]
  唐亚林 , 钱坤 . “找回居民”：专家介入与城市基层治理模式创新的内生动力再造. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(1): 84-96.
10. [10]
  杨志军 . 中央聚合—地方封闭政策体制及其更新：国家治理现代化的政治资源再造. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 98-111.
11. [11]
  姚尚建 . 城市叙事与空间重构. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(08): 92-99.
12. [12]
  纪竞垚 , 刘守英 . 代际革命与农民的城市权利. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(7): 43-55.
13. [13]
  姚尚建 . 贫困与城市性的纠偏. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(5): 87-95.
14. [14]
  陈钊 . 大国治理中的产业政策. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 46-57, 82.
15. [15]
  刘欣 , 田丰 . 城市基层党建与社区社会资本生成. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(6): 160-170.
16. [16]
  陈诗一 , 刘朝良 , 金浩 . 环境规制、劳动力配置与城市发展. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(2): 48-62.
17. [17]
  李杰伟 , 韩立彬 . 控制人口能缓解城市通勤问题吗. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(2): 58-67.
18. [18]
  李明 . 受众视角下的公共政策执行及其效果—— 基于中国村民村委会选举参与的分析. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(07): 45-59.
19. [19]
  邓智团，郭红星 . 创新时代城市发展新逻辑——城市舒适性吸引人才的理论与实证. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(10): 61-74.
20. [20]
  叶敏，张建雷 . 盘活式发展：县域政府经营地方的新形态. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(11): 110-122.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 0
文章访问数: 290
HTML全文浏览量: 42

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

“中央出题—地方自选”：城市治理政策何以反制政策效能层层衰减

谢伊云

作者简介:谢伊云，海南大学国际旅游与公共管理学院副研究员(海南海口570100)，南开大学中国政府发展联合研究中心研究员(天津300071)。

基金项目: 本文为国家社会科学基金青年项目“‘党员下沉基层’背景下的社区治理共同体建设机制研究”（21CZZ008）的阶段性成果

关键词:

政策执行｜城市治理｜示范城市｜地方政府

摘要: 近年来，以“中央出题、地方自选”的国家示范城市创建工作成为热潮，实现了中央政策效能在基层的充分发挥。研究表明，国家示范城市政策：（1）具有低模糊性、低冲突性与高弹性等政策属性，有利于减少地方政府政策执行的阻力；（2）提供了双重激励耦合地方政府的政策执行动机：一是为地方政府提供物质性激励；二是提高地方职能部门能动性、强化地方政府优化治理绩效的使命感。国家示范城市政策嵌入了中央对城市治理向标准化、精细化转型的意图，改变了国家政策执行的层级节制关系，激发了地方自觉，是中央阶段性、技巧性改善城市治理、规避政策效能减码的有效尝试。

English Abstract

“Central Government Issues Policy and Local Governments Choose”—— How to Avoid the Gradual Decline of Policy Implementation

XIE Yiyun

Abstract: Avoiding the gradual decline of policy implementation is a practical problem that remains to be solved in the academic and practical circles.In recent years,the creation of “national model cities” has become a new phenomenon of local governance.The central ministries and commissions have issued policies,and local governments below the provincial level have independently participated in,implemented and disseminated policies with high quality,realizing the full play of the effectiveness of the central policy at the grass-roots level.Through combing the 22 types of demonstration city policies launched by the central ministries and commissions from 2009 to 2020,the study found that the demonstration city policies have the policy attributes of low ambiguity,low conflict and high flexibility; At the same time,they provide “two-dimensional incentives” to couple the motivation of local government policy implementation,which not only ensures that local policy implementation can obtain external political,promotion or financial protection,but also pays attention to strengthening the internal perception of local government’s power status,role and mission.The national model city policy,through the mode of “Central Government Issues Poilicy and Local Governments Choose”,not only embeds the central government’s intention to transform the city to standardized and refined governance,but also changes the general bureaucratic relationship of policy implementation,endows local governments with freedom in policy implementation,activates local consciousness,and is a successful case of efficient policy implementation shown in practice.Future research can focus on the vivid city creation practice,and excavate the bureaucratic relationship and government action logic under the background of the implementation of model city policies from an empirical perspective.

“中央出题—地方自选”：城市治理政策何以反制政策效能层层衰减

作者简介: 谢伊云，海南大学国际旅游与公共管理学院副研究员(海南海口570100)，南开大学中国政府发展联合研究中心研究员(天津300071)。;

“Central Government Issues Policy and Local Governments Choose”—— How to Avoid the Gradual Decline of Policy Implementation

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

“中央出题—地方自选”：城市治理政策何以反制政策效能层层衰减

作者简介:谢伊云，海南大学国际旅游与公共管理学院副研究员(海南海口570100)，南开大学中国政府发展联合研究中心研究员(天津300071)。

English Abstract

“Central Government Issues Policy and Local Governments Choose”—— How to Avoid the Gradual Decline of Policy Implementation

全文HTML

目录

“中央出题—地方自选”：城市治理政策何以反制政策效能层层衰减

作者简介: 谢伊云，海南大学国际旅游与公共管理学院副研究员(海南海口570100)，南开大学中国政府发展联合研究中心研究员(天津300071)。;

“Central Government Issues Policy and Local Governments Choose”—— How to Avoid the Gradual Decline of Policy Implementation

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

“中央出题—地方自选”：城市治理政策何以反制政策效能层层衰减

作者简介:谢伊云，海南大学国际旅游与公共管理学院副研究员(海南海口570100)，南开大学中国政府发展联合研究中心研究员(天津300071)。

English Abstract

“Central Government Issues Policy and Local Governments Choose”—— How to Avoid the Gradual Decline of Policy Implementation

全文HTML

目录