Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 51 Issue 8
August 2019
Article Contents

Citation: Wei WANG, Yufei LIU and Yan XU. Grounds of Criminal Penalty between Confucianism and Legalism: The Ancient, Modern, Chinese and Western Dimensions of Penalty for Theft in the Qing Code[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, (8): 106-121. shu

Grounds of Criminal Penalty between Confucianism and Legalism: The Ancient, Modern, Chinese and Western Dimensions of Penalty for Theft in the Qing Code

  • Modern Western criminal law has three theories for the foundation of criminal law, i.e., the punishment of retribution, of precaution, and incorporation. In Chinese tradition, Confucianism and Legalism which had a far-reaching influence in ancient times, and the issue has been received some related probing, and it can be classified into the " incorporation” theory. It means that retribution, determent and education function is confirmed. Legal penalty is seen as a retribution to crimes, and precaution is the aim of penalty. As for the means of precaution, Legalism emphasizes determent, it believes that penalty is enough, while Confucianism sees its function of education, so, it advocates a comprehensive function of rituals, musics, penalties and administration are to be put together for a function. The development of thousands of years’ traditional legal system in China had been co-founded by Confucianism and Legalism. The traditional theory of penalty is expressed in the Qing Code for theft, which had been agitated, wavered and progressed between different ideas. The current Chinese legal theory and system come from the west, but the traditional theory and practice can be beneficial complements by its positive and negative experiences with a higher level of Confucian " incorporation” and Legalism’s penalty theory
  • 加载中

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views: 8608 Times PDF downloads: 21 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(21)
  • Abstract views(8608)
  • HTML views(875)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          Grounds of Criminal Penalty between Confucianism and Legalism: The Ancient, Modern, Chinese and Western Dimensions of Penalty for Theft in the Qing Code

          Abstract: Modern Western criminal law has three theories for the foundation of criminal law, i.e., the punishment of retribution, of precaution, and incorporation. In Chinese tradition, Confucianism and Legalism which had a far-reaching influence in ancient times, and the issue has been received some related probing, and it can be classified into the " incorporation” theory. It means that retribution, determent and education function is confirmed. Legal penalty is seen as a retribution to crimes, and precaution is the aim of penalty. As for the means of precaution, Legalism emphasizes determent, it believes that penalty is enough, while Confucianism sees its function of education, so, it advocates a comprehensive function of rituals, musics, penalties and administration are to be put together for a function. The development of thousands of years’ traditional legal system in China had been co-founded by Confucianism and Legalism. The traditional theory of penalty is expressed in the Qing Code for theft, which had been agitated, wavered and progressed between different ideas. The current Chinese legal theory and system come from the west, but the traditional theory and practice can be beneficial complements by its positive and negative experiences with a higher level of Confucian " incorporation” and Legalism’s penalty theory

            HTML

          Table (2)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return