“表象”的使用和意义—弗雷格与康德比较研究
Kant’s and Frege’s Use of Vorstellung and Its Significance
-
摘要: 康德用“表象”(Vorstellung、vorstellen)一词来说明感性和知性等不同的认识层次,说明“对对象的表象”和“对对象的表象的表象”以及理解和洞见的区别;弗雷格用“表象”(Vorstellung)与思想进行区别,说明表象需要承载者,而思想不需要承载者,从而更好地说明思想的客观性。他们关于“表象”一词的使用方式不同,形成的理论也不同,但有一点却是共同的,即他们都把“表象”看作一个自明的概念。同一个词的不同使用,可以显示出康德和弗雷格理论的差异,也显示出传统哲学与分析哲学的不同。而同一个用语的共同使用,则至少隐含着一种思想文化的传承。这说明,传统哲学,特别是德国哲学对弗雷格是有影响的。Abstract: Kant uses the word “Vorstellung” to explain different levels of cognition, such as sensitivity and understanding, showing the difference between “Vorstellung of object” and “Vorstellung of the Vorstellung of object”, and their distinction to understanding and insight, etc. Frege uses the word “Vorstellung” to provide an explanation for his “thought”, showing that a “Vorstellung” has a bearer, while a thought is the sense of a sentence and therefore objective. Kant and Frege are different in their way of using “Vorstellung”, so their theories are different, which show the difference between traditional philosophy and analytical philosophy as well. But the way in which they use the same word “Vorstellung” does show something: at least it shows that the traditional philosophy, especially the German philosophy, has some influence on Frege.
-
Key words:
- Vorstellung /
- understanding /
- thought
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 1495
- HTML全文浏览量: 349