家与社会治理:价值、方法、对象和主体
作者简介:肖瑛,上海大学社会学院教授(上海200444);郭琦,上海大学社会学院博士研究生(上海200444);符佳佳,上海大学社会学院硕士研究生(上海200444);王东晖,上海大学社会学院硕士研究生(上海200444)。
基金项目:
本文系国家社会科学基金一般项目“文明比较与中国社会理论的早期构建研究”(22VRC097)的阶段性成果
摘要: 近年来,宅基地重新分配、农房改造是农村社会治理的重要内容。田野调查发现:相关社会政策在基层的实践一方面改善了农村人居环境,促进了城乡一体化;另一方面不经意地以老人的离家出走为代价,老人被迫进入老年公寓或不同类型和层次的养老院。但相异的养老机构给老人提供的重建“家”的条件各不相同,硬件设施越完善的养老机构反而越远离老人“回家”的期待。农村老人的此类遭遇引出了家与社会治理的关系问题。家在社会治理中的角色,大致可以分为作为价值源泉、方法、对象和主体四种。社会治理应该尽可能呵护家庭价值,尊重家庭在治理中的主体地位,避免对家庭价值和家庭主体的分化性利用,防止治理理念上的家庭隐喻与治理实践中的家作为工具的分裂。
Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects
Abstract: In recent years,the redistribution of housing land and the rebuilding of rural houses are important contents of rural social governance in China.Field investigation shows that the practice of relevant social policies at the grassroots level has double consequences: improving the rural living environments and promoting the integration of urban and rural areas on the one hand,and on the other hand,the elderly are forced to leave their homes and families,entering the apartments for the elderly or the nursing homes of different types and levels.However,the nursing homes of different types and levels provide different conditions for the reconstruction of “home” for the elderly,and the more complete the hardware facilities of the nursing homes,the more far away from the expectation of the elderly to “go home”.This kind of experience of the rural elderly leads to the topic of the relationships between family and social governance.The role of family in social governance can be roughly divided into four kinds: source of values,methods,objects and subjects.Social governance should care for family values as much as possible,respect the dominant position of family in governance,avoid the differentiated use of family values and family subjects,and prevent the division of family metaphor in governance philosophy and family as a tool in governance practice.