Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 57 Issue 5
May 2025
Article Contents

Citation: XU Yingjin. On the Philosophical Grounds of Commonsensical Ethical Canons——From the Lens of Kitarō Nishida's Philosophy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(5): 27-35. shu

On the Philosophical Grounds of Commonsensical Ethical Canons——From the Lens of Kitarō Nishida's Philosophy

  • The so-called "commonsensical ethical canons" refer to cross-culturally holding ethical guidelines encouraging, say, the care of the old and the weak, the respect of human rights, among others.There are three sources for revealing the affordability of these canons in Kitarō Nishida's philosophy.The first source is a semi-Hegelian structure facilitating the interaction between the extreme particularity of perceptions and the extreme generality of Absolute Nothingness.It is this structure, which is brought into Nishida's picture via his "Actor"-based narrative, that further facilitates Nishida's attempt to introduce universally applicable ethical codes into specific scenarios.The second source of a normal ethics in Nishida's philosophy is a phenomenologically achievable grasp of "modality", which means the inter- worldly holding structure among the actuality and its surrounding possibilities.When supplemented by a Fichtean notion of Will desiring to travel through as more possible worlds as possible, the preceding modality-based picture would immediately yield the notion of "oughtness", the underlying conceptual apparatus for nearly all ethical narratives.The last source of a normal ethics in Nishida's philosophy is "Thou", namely, another respectable "I" representing all human- beings.Notably, Nishida's account of the I-Thou relationship is heavily theologically/aesthetically-laden to allow him to smoothly fill the gap between ethics and the philosophy of religion/art.Since all the three sources are missing in Heidegger's philosophy, whose authenticity/inauthenticity dichotomy frustrates the assimilation of any of the three resources into its own system, it would be no surprise to find that his philosophy is relatively normal-ethics-unaffordable.
  • 加载中

Article Metrics

Article views: 56 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(56)
  • HTML views(6)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        On the Philosophical Grounds of Commonsensical Ethical Canons——From the Lens of Kitarō Nishida's Philosophy

        Abstract: The so-called "commonsensical ethical canons" refer to cross-culturally holding ethical guidelines encouraging, say, the care of the old and the weak, the respect of human rights, among others.There are three sources for revealing the affordability of these canons in Kitarō Nishida's philosophy.The first source is a semi-Hegelian structure facilitating the interaction between the extreme particularity of perceptions and the extreme generality of Absolute Nothingness.It is this structure, which is brought into Nishida's picture via his "Actor"-based narrative, that further facilitates Nishida's attempt to introduce universally applicable ethical codes into specific scenarios.The second source of a normal ethics in Nishida's philosophy is a phenomenologically achievable grasp of "modality", which means the inter- worldly holding structure among the actuality and its surrounding possibilities.When supplemented by a Fichtean notion of Will desiring to travel through as more possible worlds as possible, the preceding modality-based picture would immediately yield the notion of "oughtness", the underlying conceptual apparatus for nearly all ethical narratives.The last source of a normal ethics in Nishida's philosophy is "Thou", namely, another respectable "I" representing all human- beings.Notably, Nishida's account of the I-Thou relationship is heavily theologically/aesthetically-laden to allow him to smoothly fill the gap between ethics and the philosophy of religion/art.Since all the three sources are missing in Heidegger's philosophy, whose authenticity/inauthenticity dichotomy frustrates the assimilation of any of the three resources into its own system, it would be no surprise to find that his philosophy is relatively normal-ethics-unaffordable.

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return