Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 55 Issue 1
May 2023
Article Contents

Citation: Yajun CHEN. How the Myth of the Given is Collapsed by Pittsburgh School[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 20-30. shu

How the Myth of the Given is Collapsed by Pittsburgh School

  • Pittsburgh School’s deconstruction of the myth of the given is composed of the three successive steps: Sellars starts the work by demarcation of the natural and rational spaces, but he finally dosen’t give up the given completely, due to his standpoint of scientifical realism. McDowell goes forward in Sellars direction by replacing nonconceptual sense-multifold with the conceptual experience, which forms the final court of knowledge. But he has always been keeping an empathy to the appeal of the given. Comparing with them, Brandom is more radical in destroying the myth of the given. He completely abandons the thinking way of empiricism, not looking forward the constraint of the knowledge from the world, but from the language peers instead. He calls himself a rational pragmatist, however, since his practice is only in the sense of the discursive one, not the interaction between lives and their environments, which makes him unable to account for the source of the norms.
  • 加载中

Article Metrics

Article views: 861 Times PDF downloads: 10 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(10)
  • Abstract views(861)
  • HTML views(164)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        How the Myth of the Given is Collapsed by Pittsburgh School

        Abstract: Pittsburgh School’s deconstruction of the myth of the given is composed of the three successive steps: Sellars starts the work by demarcation of the natural and rational spaces, but he finally dosen’t give up the given completely, due to his standpoint of scientifical realism. McDowell goes forward in Sellars direction by replacing nonconceptual sense-multifold with the conceptual experience, which forms the final court of knowledge. But he has always been keeping an empathy to the appeal of the given. Comparing with them, Brandom is more radical in destroying the myth of the given. He completely abandons the thinking way of empiricism, not looking forward the constraint of the knowledge from the world, but from the language peers instead. He calls himself a rational pragmatist, however, since his practice is only in the sense of the discursive one, not the interaction between lives and their environments, which makes him unable to account for the source of the norms.

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return