Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 51 Issue 5
May 2019
Article Contents

Citation: Guoqiang TIAN. Policy Coordination and Reform Response for China’s High-quality Economic Development[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(5): 32-38. shu

Policy Coordination and Reform Response for China’s High-quality Economic Development

  • One of the fundamental reasons for the continuous sharp decline of China’s economic growth since 2010 is the failure to properly handle the interactive and complementary relationship between short-term policy response and mid- and long-term deep structural reform. Consequently, China is facing many internal risks, coupled with external uncertainties that add to the economic difficulty. To address the short-term complex situation, China needs to strengthen policy coordination and structural reform in an interactive manner to achieve mid- and long-term high-quality development. Current efforts to stabilize growth, promote reform, adjust structure, benefit people’s livelihood and prevent risks must be positioned within a comprehensive governance framework featuring dynamic linkage and general equilibrium, so as to reverse the continuous deceleration trend. This is an inevitable requirement for reform and opening-up in the new historical period and is also essential for adapting to the transition of economic growth engines, the transformation of major social contradictions, and the restructuring and upgrading of institutions and mechanisms. In the face of reform and development challenges, we must move beyond the mere agreement on reform toward further clarifying how to reform and who is responsible and capable of the implementation. This requires both short-term monetary, fiscal and macro-prudential policy adjustments and mid- and long-term structural and institutional reforms, in particular deep structural reforms in financial and fiscal systems, so as to foster a virtuous circle between the financial sector and real economy, solve the dilemma of private enterprises’ financing difficulties and high costs and local governments’ high debts, achieve incentive compatibility between the central and local governments, and promote benign competition for development in the private sector. In this way China’s market-oriented reform and opening-up to economic globalization can go deeper to realize sustainable and benign economic development.
  • 加载中

Article Metrics

Article views: 1837 Times PDF downloads: 7 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(7)
  • Abstract views(1837)
  • HTML views(173)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Policy Coordination and Reform Response for China’s High-quality Economic Development

        Abstract: One of the fundamental reasons for the continuous sharp decline of China’s economic growth since 2010 is the failure to properly handle the interactive and complementary relationship between short-term policy response and mid- and long-term deep structural reform. Consequently, China is facing many internal risks, coupled with external uncertainties that add to the economic difficulty. To address the short-term complex situation, China needs to strengthen policy coordination and structural reform in an interactive manner to achieve mid- and long-term high-quality development. Current efforts to stabilize growth, promote reform, adjust structure, benefit people’s livelihood and prevent risks must be positioned within a comprehensive governance framework featuring dynamic linkage and general equilibrium, so as to reverse the continuous deceleration trend. This is an inevitable requirement for reform and opening-up in the new historical period and is also essential for adapting to the transition of economic growth engines, the transformation of major social contradictions, and the restructuring and upgrading of institutions and mechanisms. In the face of reform and development challenges, we must move beyond the mere agreement on reform toward further clarifying how to reform and who is responsible and capable of the implementation. This requires both short-term monetary, fiscal and macro-prudential policy adjustments and mid- and long-term structural and institutional reforms, in particular deep structural reforms in financial and fiscal systems, so as to foster a virtuous circle between the financial sector and real economy, solve the dilemma of private enterprises’ financing difficulties and high costs and local governments’ high debts, achieve incentive compatibility between the central and local governments, and promote benign competition for development in the private sector. In this way China’s market-oriented reform and opening-up to economic globalization can go deeper to realize sustainable and benign economic development.

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return