过程和情境：求真的社会科学因果方法

臧雷振; 朱逸飞

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

May 2023

Article Contents

Citation: Leizhen ZANG and Yifei ZHU. Process and Context: A Social Science Causal Approach[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 33-44. shu

Process and Context: A Social Science Causal Approach

Leizhen ZANG ,
Yifei ZHU

Abstract

How does current social science research balance generalized and specialized explanations? This question needs a systematic review of current methodology. We explored two leading ways of causal reasoning, mechanical causality and counterfactual causality, and concluded that there are two types of identification strategy. Mechanical causality relates to procedural strategy, which highlights key evidence and causal chain; counterfactual causality relates to contextual strategy, which stresses intervention, mediation, and selection. We find that the two strategies have enhanced social science’s ability to map hypotheses to evidence, but they may also encourage scholars to favor specialized explanations. With the use of procedural and contextual strategies, we reexamined Fei Hsiao-tung’s work on peasant life and rural economy, and elaborated the news and risks brought by current trends in social science methodology.
- mechanical causality,
- counterfactual causality,
- procedural strategy,
- contextual strategy,
- Fei Hsiao-Tung
References
Access
1. [1]
  Youmei LI , Jing GENG . The Paradigm of Knowledge Production in Chinese Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(6): 5-16.
2. [2]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 79-115.
3. [3]
  Jingkun CHEN . Physicalist Panpsychism: The Combination Problem and Phenomenal Bonding Solution. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(5): 30-38.
4. [4]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 30-41.
5. [5]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 133-142.
6. [6]
  Yuefei WU . Towards Mobility Governance: Theoretical Reconstruction of New Regional Space and Its Action Strategies. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 86-95.
7. [7]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 179-184.
8. [8]
  . From Government Domination to Multiple Actors Initiation: Practice Logic and Further Development of “the Belt and Road”. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04): 46-57.
9. [9]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 111-119.
10. [10]
  Mingming WANG . Association, Comparison and Reconsideration: Fei Xiaotong’s Thesis of “Heaven-Man Unity” and the Anthropological “Ontological Turn”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 143-167, 178.
11. [11]
  Luming QIU . Event, Process and Political Culture. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 160-171.
12. [12]
  Qi CHEN . The Institutional Pendulum and Its Evolutionary Mechanism. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 110-126.
13. [13]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 125-136.
14. [14]
  Jinhai LIU . Elements, Mechanism and Pattern of National Growth. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 74-83.
15. [15]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(03): 68-80.
16. [16]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 88-98.
17. [17]
  Lin YUE . The Social Genetation Mechanism of Privacy. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 104-116.
18. [18]
  Guozheng CHEN , Qiu ZHU . Dynamic Evolution of Modern Urban Governance Mechanisms Research. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 86-95, 122.
19. [19]
  Huping SHANG . The Endogenous Risks of the Bureaucratic Organization and their Prevention and Control during the National Governance Modernization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 83-97.
20. [20]
  Jie CHEN , Yidong WU . The Possible Conflict between the Housing Rights and the Rights to Public Services Availability in the Process of “Equal Rights between Buyer and Tenant”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 44-56.

Figures(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 1179 Times PDF downloads: 11 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(11)
Abstract views(1179)
HTML views(215)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Process and Context: A Social Science Causal Approach

Leizhen ZANG
Yifei ZHU

Available Online: 2023-04-20

Abstract: How does current social science research balance generalized and specialized explanations? This question needs a systematic review of current methodology. We explored two leading ways of causal reasoning, mechanical causality and counterfactual causality, and concluded that there are two types of identification strategy. Mechanical causality relates to procedural strategy, which highlights key evidence and causal chain; counterfactual causality relates to contextual strategy, which stresses intervention, mediation, and selection. We find that the two strategies have enhanced social science’s ability to map hypotheses to evidence, but they may also encourage scholars to favor specialized explanations. With the use of procedural and contextual strategies, we reexamined Fei Hsiao-tung’s work on peasant life and rural economy, and elaborated the news and risks brought by current trends in social science methodology.