公共治理边际模型及以人民为中心理念验证

何翔舟

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

January 2021

Article Contents

Citation: Xiangzhou HE. The Marginal Model of Public Governance and the Verification of the People-oriented Public Governance Idea[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(12): 68-78. shu

The Marginal Model of Public Governance and the Verification of the People-oriented Public Governance Idea

Xiangzhou HE

Abstract

As the largest and purest public product in the world, public governance is an important core issue that cannot be ignored in any society and any historical stage. Whether in theory or practice, the idea of public governance is inseparable from the value of a specific period and specific environmental conditions. This value-oriented idea of public governance is basically that the public resource allocation system and management mechanism arranged by decision makers tend to be certain groups and classes within the predetermined management radius. This kind of institutional arrangement that benefits a certain group is the fundamental difference between different idea of public governance. In order to clarify the scientific nature of different governance idea and find the ideal public governance system and mechanism theoretically, we establish a marginal model of public governance. Through the marginal model of public governance, under the premise that other factors remain unchanged, it objectively analyzes the pros and cons of different governance idea. In addition, based on the value results of people-oriented public governance idea and practices, the objectivity and scientific nature of the marginal model of public governance are tested. The verification found that the people-oriented public governance idea assumed by the model has a tendency to minimize the marginal cost and maximize the marginal utility, which is very consistent with the reality. At the same time, based on China’s people-oriented governance model for thousands of years, some “flourishing age” and contemporary Chinese governance schemes have in turn proved the scientific nature of the model.
- public governance model,
- values,
- people-oriented,
- Chinese paradigm
References
Access
1. [1]
  HE Jun . Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 56-69.
2. [2]
  WANG Qi . From Individual Experience to “Inner Experience”——Focusing on Bog om Adler. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 32-40.
3. [3]
  XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.
4. [4]
  ZHANG Yi . Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 29-40.
5. [5]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
6. [6]
  LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.
7. [7]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
8. [8]
  HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.
9. [9]
  SUO Liming , WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.
10. [10]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
11. [11]
  LI Ming , XU Haiqi , XU Changtuo . A Statistical Framework and Measurement Results for Public Finance Investing in People. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 91-105.
12. [12]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
13. [13]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

Figures(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 4539 Times PDF downloads: 16 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(16)
Abstract views(4539)
HTML views(371)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The Marginal Model of Public Governance and the Verification of the People-oriented Public Governance Idea

Xiangzhou HE

Available Online: 2020-12-21

Abstract: As the largest and purest public product in the world, public governance is an important core issue that cannot be ignored in any society and any historical stage. Whether in theory or practice, the idea of public governance is inseparable from the value of a specific period and specific environmental conditions. This value-oriented idea of public governance is basically that the public resource allocation system and management mechanism arranged by decision makers tend to be certain groups and classes within the predetermined management radius. This kind of institutional arrangement that benefits a certain group is the fundamental difference between different idea of public governance. In order to clarify the scientific nature of different governance idea and find the ideal public governance system and mechanism theoretically, we establish a marginal model of public governance. Through the marginal model of public governance, under the premise that other factors remain unchanged, it objectively analyzes the pros and cons of different governance idea. In addition, based on the value results of people-oriented public governance idea and practices, the objectivity and scientific nature of the marginal model of public governance are tested. The verification found that the people-oriented public governance idea assumed by the model has a tendency to minimize the marginal cost and maximize the marginal utility, which is very consistent with the reality. At the same time, based on China’s people-oriented governance model for thousands of years, some “flourishing age” and contemporary Chinese governance schemes have in turn proved the scientific nature of the model.