Citation:
Jianzhang ZHOU. Scientific Revolution and the Capacity of Philosophy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 72-81, 150.
Scientific Revolution and the Capacity of Philosophy
-
Abstract
Under the background of modern scientific revolution to examine the epistemology turn/linguistic turn, the essence of these turns is the transformation of philosophy from authoritative voice in declaring the philosophy-science truth about reality to the second order discourse with regard to the scientific truth, and the powerful impact of science’s rise up resulted in the scientism tendency and of Anglo-American philosophy. However, if philosophy withdraws from the nature research field is rational and understandable with the mature of nature sciences, then in humanistic and historical areas, there is still the traditional space left to the philosophy as an authentic academy, and in this field, philosophy and humanistic studies including literature and art as Heidegger said are allies, both have the mission to give the truth concerning being in different levels. In this case, Philosophy not only as a theory of truth, but also provide truth differs to the scientific one. Between providing epistemological argument and endorsement for science and gives truth itself, the latter rather the former is the major thing philosophy supposes to do.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(02): 56-65.
-
[2]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(01): 67-74.
-
[3]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(10): 36-43.
-
[4]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(03): 30-39.
-
[5]
MA Lin
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(9): 35-43.
-
[6]
HAN Shuifa
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(7): 5-24.
-
[7]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(07): 31-37.
-
[8]
Qingshan YAN
. A Conceptual History and Philosophy of Understanding. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(6): 45-57.
-
[9]
Jiaxin ZHOU
. Critical Economics and Philosophy of Praxis. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(3): 17-25.
-
[10]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(8): 209-216.
-
[11]
Guojun XIA
. Naturalist and Anti-naturalist Fractals of American Philosophical Holism. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(10): 45-59.
-
[12]
Xiaoming WU
. About the Legitimacy of “Chinese Philosophy”. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(4): 5-20.
-
[13]
Mingdong GU
. The Philosophical and Aesthetic Foundations of Chinese and Western Fiction. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(11): 127-138.
-
[14]
Linhe HAN
. On the Problem of Overdetermination in Kant’s Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(8): 37-45, 55.
-
[15]
WU Xiaoming
. Fundamental Difference between Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy: A Third Thesis. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(8): 5-26.
-
[16]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(8): 179-184.
-
[17]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(02): 5-22.
-
[18]
CHENG Lesong
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(7): 32-38.
-
[19]
Songhua FANG
, Wufeng XIONG
. A Comparison of Chinese and Western Philosophy and the Construction of Contemporary “Chinese Philosophy”. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(12): 5-12.
-
[20]
Williamson Timothy
. Philosophy and Its Future. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(7): 14-21.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: