科学革命与哲学的可能
作者简介:周建漳，厦门大学哲学系教授（福建厦门 361005）
摘要: 在科学革命背景下审视近代以降哲学的“认识论/语言论”两大转向，其实质是哲学于丧失直接言说关于世界的哲学−科学真理的权威后转入二阶反思性分析话语，同时，科学在思想领域的强势影响，还导致以英美哲学为代表哲学的科学主义倾向与进路。如果说，在自然科学研究领域哲学话语的退场或有其学术必要性与现实合理性，那么，在自然之外的人文领域，哲学与艺术则如海德格尔所说有亲缘关系，共同承担揭示与言说真理的使命。在哲学与真理传统关系的背景下，真理哲学与哲学真理皆为哲学题中应有之义，并且以后者为本位。为科学提供背书式哲学论证，以科学真理为样本理解哲学真理引喻失义，不足为训。
Scientific Revolution and the Capacity of Philosophy
- Available Online:
2023-04-20
Abstract: Under the background of modern scientific revolution to examine the epistemology turn/linguistic turn, the essence of these turns is the transformation of philosophy from authoritative voice in declaring the philosophy-science truth about reality to the second order discourse with regard to the scientific truth, and the powerful impact of science’s rise up resulted in the scientism tendency and of Anglo-American philosophy. However, if philosophy withdraws from the nature research field is rational and understandable with the mature of nature sciences, then in humanistic and historical areas, there is still the traditional space left to the philosophy as an authentic academy, and in this field, philosophy and humanistic studies including literature and art as Heidegger said are allies, both have the mission to give the truth concerning being in different levels. In this case, Philosophy not only as a theory of truth, but also provide truth differs to the scientific one. Between providing epistemological argument and endorsement for science and gives truth itself, the latter rather the former is the major thing philosophy supposes to do.
点击查看大图
下载:
沪公网安备 31010102003103号