Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 53 Issue 11
January 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Yingjin XU. How Could Contemporary Western Epistemology be Integrated into a Chinese-based Framework[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 16-29. shu

How Could Contemporary Western Epistemology be Integrated into a Chinese-based Framework

  • Post-Gettier contemporary epistemology is different from traditional epistemology in the sense that the former is concerned more with the normative dimension of knowledge, while the latter is concerned more with how knowledge is actually formed. Due to the cultural differences concerning how to understand key epistemological terms like “knowledge”, “belief ”, “justification” etc., the Chinese-speaking philosophical world, analytic thinkers precluded, has long been unable to appreciate the fruits of the post-Gettier epistemology. Two intermediate moves are proposed to take for filling the gap between post-Gettier epistemology and the Chinese-speaking intellectual community: Firstly, the fusion of AI and epistemology is encouraged, hence, such a move would provide a chance to double-check the putative universal applicability of specific conclusions of the post-Gettier epistemology from an engineering perspective; Secondly, an algorithm-oriented reconstruction of the Confucian theory of the rectification of names is also encouraged to bring new life to some traditional Chinese-based thoughts on the process of epistemic justification.
  • 加载中

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views: 1441 Times PDF downloads: 10 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(10)
  • Abstract views(1441)
  • HTML views(107)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          How Could Contemporary Western Epistemology be Integrated into a Chinese-based Framework

          Abstract: Post-Gettier contemporary epistemology is different from traditional epistemology in the sense that the former is concerned more with the normative dimension of knowledge, while the latter is concerned more with how knowledge is actually formed. Due to the cultural differences concerning how to understand key epistemological terms like “knowledge”, “belief ”, “justification” etc., the Chinese-speaking philosophical world, analytic thinkers precluded, has long been unable to appreciate the fruits of the post-Gettier epistemology. Two intermediate moves are proposed to take for filling the gap between post-Gettier epistemology and the Chinese-speaking intellectual community: Firstly, the fusion of AI and epistemology is encouraged, hence, such a move would provide a chance to double-check the putative universal applicability of specific conclusions of the post-Gettier epistemology from an engineering perspective; Secondly, an algorithm-oriented reconstruction of the Confucian theory of the rectification of names is also encouraged to bring new life to some traditional Chinese-based thoughts on the process of epistemic justification.

            HTML

          Table (2)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return