理论唤魂：审视“现代”的社会科学眼光

任剑涛

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

May 2023

Article Contents

Citation: Jiantao REN. Calling the Soul of Theory: The Perspective of Social Sciences Examining “the Modern”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 5-16. shu

Calling the Soul of Theory: The Perspective of Social Sciences Examining “the Modern”

Jiantao REN

Abstract

To examine “the modern”, there are two basic approaches, humanities and social sciences. The humanities not only occur or appear at the same time as “the modern”, but also become an impressive academic system demonstrating “the modern”. The perspective of social sciences especially social theory, which examines “the modern”, is an approach that gives priority to factual description, comparative analysis, and overall affirmation. The empirical method in the social sciences, on the one hand, seeks to show people a true and accurate picture of the modern, and on the other hand, it mimics the natural sciences to provide a mathematical or digital descriptive analysis of the modern. Together, the two contribute to the grand and the micro theoretical traditions of social theory and empirical research, respectively. The pros and cons of empirical research, especially the quantitative research of “the modern”, come out together. The perspective of social sciences alone, which examines the “modern”, needs to be corrected with reason, reflected, and transcended. In this way, this perspective not only promotes the integration of social theory and social scientific vision, but also links up the social sciences and humanities again.
- the modern,
- humanities,
- social sciences,
- quantitative research,
- calling the soul
References
Access
1. [1]
  Xin HE . Study on Law with Experience:Based on External Perspectives of Social Sciences. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 106-113.
2. [2]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 5-17.
3. [3]
  Leizhen ZANG , Yifei ZHU . Process and Context: A Social Science Causal Approach. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 33-44.
4. [4]
  Xuewei ZHAI . Cross-culture, Translation and Indigenization of Social Sciences. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 128-140.
5. [5]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 66-75.
6. [6]
  Jinzhao CHEN . The Construction Significance of Jurisprudence to Chinese Philosophy and Social Science System. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 106-120.
7. [7]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 13-14.
8. [8]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 5-10.
9. [9]
  Guozheng CHEN , Qiu ZHU . Dynamic Evolution of Modern Urban Governance Mechanisms Research. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 86-95, 122.
10. [10]
  Fengyang ZHANG . The Linguistic Approach in the Study of Modernity. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 52-63.
11. [11]
  Liwen ZHANG . The Modern Value of Li Tuixi’s Humanistic Spirits. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 5-14.
12. [12]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 17-19.
13. [13]
  Zhang Kangzhi . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(5): 78-87.
14. [14]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 211-216.
15. [15]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 25-33.
16. [16]
  Jiming CAI , Minsi ZHENG , Mengxing LIU . The Criteria for Judging Whether China Economic and Social Development Plans are Scientific and Reasonable. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(9): 46-56.
17. [17]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 206-211.
18. [18]
  Xudong CHEN , Lin CHENG . Research on History of Modern Chinese Economic Thought and Construction of Academic Discourse System in the New Era. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 45-52.
19. [19]
  . Faded Radical Politics and Plural Urban Society: Rethinking Modernization Studies. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 177-184.
20. [20]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 11-19.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 573 Times PDF downloads: 19 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(19)
Abstract views(573)
HTML views(313)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Calling the Soul of Theory: The Perspective of Social Sciences Examining “the Modern”

Jiantao REN

Available Online: 2023-04-20

Abstract: To examine “the modern”, there are two basic approaches, humanities and social sciences. The humanities not only occur or appear at the same time as “the modern”, but also become an impressive academic system demonstrating “the modern”. The perspective of social sciences especially social theory, which examines “the modern”, is an approach that gives priority to factual description, comparative analysis, and overall affirmation. The empirical method in the social sciences, on the one hand, seeks to show people a true and accurate picture of the modern, and on the other hand, it mimics the natural sciences to provide a mathematical or digital descriptive analysis of the modern. Together, the two contribute to the grand and the micro theoretical traditions of social theory and empirical research, respectively. The pros and cons of empirical research, especially the quantitative research of “the modern”, come out together. The perspective of social sciences alone, which examines the “modern”, needs to be corrected with reason, reflected, and transcended. In this way, this perspective not only promotes the integration of social theory and social scientific vision, but also links up the social sciences and humanities again.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Calling the Soul of Theory: The Perspective of Social Sciences Examining “the Modern”

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Calling the Soul of Theory: The Perspective of Social Sciences Examining “the Modern”

HTML

目录