Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 53 Issue 7
October 2021
Article Contents

Citation: Donghua ZHOU. China’s Status as a Major Power and Discourse Power in International Affairs after the Breakout of the Pacific War[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 202-216. shu

China’s Status as a Major Power and Discourse Power in International Affairs after the Breakout of the Pacific War

  • After the breakout of the Anti-Japanese War, the Japanese troops flagrantly violated international conventions and carried out biochemical warfare against Chinese soldiers and civilians. The CCP appealed in 1938 to condemn the crimes of Japanese troops. After the outbreak of the Pacific War, the United States and Britain held Pacific Military Meetings in Washington and London to negotiate warfares in the Pacific. As one of the “Big Four” countries, China participated in the meetings. On May 10, 1942, Winston Churchill issued a statement to stop Germany from carrying out gas warfare against the Soviet Union, without mentioning China, which greatly provoked Jiang Jieshi who considered himself as one of the leaders of the “Big Four”. He committed Song Ziwen to appeal to Franklin D. Roosevelt to issue a similar statement. After Roosevelt issued a statement to Japan on June 5, 1942, Jiang Jieshi further sought to make Gu Weijun to issue a similar statement through the Pacific Military Meetings in London. On July 14, 1942, Gu Weijun made a successful proposal, but because Churchill put aside the discussion at the meeting, Jiang Jieshi’s aim to make a public statement in London failed. In 1942, China’s endeavor to condemn Japanese troops against their biochemical warfare in 1942 was only half-successful, highlighting China’s status and power during the Anti-Japanese War. China’s series of statements to stop the biochemical warfare of the Japanese troops proved that the diplomatic efforts of weak countries, even though intertwined with the status of a mismatched “big power”, cannot gain the the right to speak on the world stage but only be a diplomatic delusion.
  • 加载中

Article Metrics

Article views: 1050 Times PDF downloads: 10 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(10)
  • Abstract views(1050)
  • HTML views(186)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        China’s Status as a Major Power and Discourse Power in International Affairs after the Breakout of the Pacific War

        Abstract: After the breakout of the Anti-Japanese War, the Japanese troops flagrantly violated international conventions and carried out biochemical warfare against Chinese soldiers and civilians. The CCP appealed in 1938 to condemn the crimes of Japanese troops. After the outbreak of the Pacific War, the United States and Britain held Pacific Military Meetings in Washington and London to negotiate warfares in the Pacific. As one of the “Big Four” countries, China participated in the meetings. On May 10, 1942, Winston Churchill issued a statement to stop Germany from carrying out gas warfare against the Soviet Union, without mentioning China, which greatly provoked Jiang Jieshi who considered himself as one of the leaders of the “Big Four”. He committed Song Ziwen to appeal to Franklin D. Roosevelt to issue a similar statement. After Roosevelt issued a statement to Japan on June 5, 1942, Jiang Jieshi further sought to make Gu Weijun to issue a similar statement through the Pacific Military Meetings in London. On July 14, 1942, Gu Weijun made a successful proposal, but because Churchill put aside the discussion at the meeting, Jiang Jieshi’s aim to make a public statement in London failed. In 1942, China’s endeavor to condemn Japanese troops against their biochemical warfare in 1942 was only half-successful, highlighting China’s status and power during the Anti-Japanese War. China’s series of statements to stop the biochemical warfare of the Japanese troops proved that the diplomatic efforts of weak countries, even though intertwined with the status of a mismatched “big power”, cannot gain the the right to speak on the world stage but only be a diplomatic delusion.

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return