分布式AI治理：技术制度博弈与社会政府协同

江小涓

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2025

Article Contents

Citation: JIANG Xiaojuan. Distributed AI Governance: Technology System Gaming and Social Government Synergy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(10): 5-13. shu

Distributed AI Governance: Technology System Gaming and Social Government Synergy

JIANG Xiaojuan

Abstract

Over the past decade, the issue of AI governancehas emerged as a focal and high-profile concern in both national and global technology governance. Despite the repeated release of related governance consensus at various national and high-level global forums, implementation has been sluggish and effectiveness limited. The reason is that these efforts have focused on forming a centralized governance model based on laws and regulations with universal applicability. However, such a model fails to align with the intrinsic characteristics of AI development and the diverse intentions of societal stakeholders. In other words, there is a lack of incentive compatibility mechanisms. This paper introduces the concept of distributed AI governance:a decentralized AI compliance community predicated on technological mechanisms to ensure mutual trust and adherence to shared rules. Such a governance paradigm aligns more coherently with both the logic of AI technology and societal preferences. The core of the analysis lies in examining the incentive and constraint mechanisms that promote the broad inclusion of heterogeneous stakeholders into distributed governance. These mechanisms encompass alignment with societal values, maintenance of corporate reputation, market competition pressures, consensus within technical communities, and the assurance capabilities of technological infrastructure. In the future, AI governance should encourage groups with the same willingness and ability to form local governance communities with diversified scales and rules, and these communities should constitute a distributed governance network throughout the whole society, converging the will and actions of millions of subjects, and accumulating small goodness into big goodness. Simultaneously, the indispensable role of centralized governance anchored in public authority must be preserved to effectively govern AI behaviors that provoke serious safety, ethical, or value-based concerns.
- AI governance,
- distributed AI governance,
- AI decentralized governance,
- AI ethics and security
References
Access
1. [1]
  LU Mingjun . Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 41-55.
2. [2]
  SUO Liming , WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.
3. [3]
  XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.
4. [4]
  WANG Qi . From Individual Experience to “Inner Experience”——Focusing on Bog om Adler. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 32-40.
5. [5]
  ZHANG Yi . Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 29-40.
6. [6]
  XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.
7. [7]
  CHEN Yinchi , WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.
8. [8]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
9. [9]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
10. [10]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
11. [11]
  ZHANG Jun , FANG Hongsheng . Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 70-90.
12. [12]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
13. [13]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
14. [14]
  LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.
15. [15]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
16. [16]
  LI Ming , XU Haiqi , XU Changtuo . A Statistical Framework and Measurement Results for Public Finance Investing in People. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 91-105.
17. [17]
  YANG Rui . Five Planet Conjunctions: Reinterpretation of the Celestial Phenomenon in 1007. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 207-216.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 1826 Times PDF downloads: 30 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(30)
Abstract views(1826)
HTML views(404)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Distributed AI Governance: Technology System Gaming and Social Government Synergy

JIANG Xiaojuan

Abstract: Over the past decade, the issue of AI governancehas emerged as a focal and high-profile concern in both national and global technology governance. Despite the repeated release of related governance consensus at various national and high-level global forums, implementation has been sluggish and effectiveness limited. The reason is that these efforts have focused on forming a centralized governance model based on laws and regulations with universal applicability. However, such a model fails to align with the intrinsic characteristics of AI development and the diverse intentions of societal stakeholders. In other words, there is a lack of incentive compatibility mechanisms. This paper introduces the concept of distributed AI governance:a decentralized AI compliance community predicated on technological mechanisms to ensure mutual trust and adherence to shared rules. Such a governance paradigm aligns more coherently with both the logic of AI technology and societal preferences. The core of the analysis lies in examining the incentive and constraint mechanisms that promote the broad inclusion of heterogeneous stakeholders into distributed governance. These mechanisms encompass alignment with societal values, maintenance of corporate reputation, market competition pressures, consensus within technical communities, and the assurance capabilities of technological infrastructure. In the future, AI governance should encourage groups with the same willingness and ability to form local governance communities with diversified scales and rules, and these communities should constitute a distributed governance network throughout the whole society, converging the will and actions of millions of subjects, and accumulating small goodness into big goodness. Simultaneously, the indispensable role of centralized governance anchored in public authority must be preserved to effectively govern AI behaviors that provoke serious safety, ethical, or value-based concerns.

HTML

Relative (17)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Distributed AI Governance: Technology System Gaming and Social Government Synergy

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Distributed AI Governance: Technology System Gaming and Social Government Synergy

HTML

目录