Citation:
LI Manli and LI Jun. Difference, Boundaries, and Qualifications: A Threefold Relational Mechanism of Occupational Trust[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(10): 132-143.
Difference, Boundaries, and Qualifications: A Threefold Relational Mechanism of Occupational Trust
-
Abstract
Public trust in occupational groups and their expertise is a fundamental pillar of social stability. As professions become increasingly integrated with the broader social environment, the system of trust once underpinned by the "closure" of classical professions has been eroded, catalyzing a relational turn in the sociology of professions. This study develops a tripartite framework of relational mechanisms shaping public trust in occupations:relationships among occupations within the professional system, relationships between occupations and the market, and relationships between occupations and the state. Employing the Chinese Occupational Classification System (2022 edition) and the Tencent AI Lab Embedding Corpus, this study quantitatively assesses public trust in occupational expertise of a comprehensive set of occupations. It investigates how occupational network structures, the public nature of occupations, and China's distinctive system of occupational governance shape such trust. The findings reveal three key insights. First, task jurisdictional similarity between occupations exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with technical trust. Second, in an era of increasingly permeable knowledge boundaries, occupational groups that are client-independent and possess more abstract expertise are more likely to garner public trust. Finally, the study advances a localized institutional explanation:in contrast to the "associational professionalism" characteristic of the Anglo-American model, China regulates professional entry barriers through state-led qualification systems, which positively influences public trust in its occupational groups.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
ZHAO Lin
, ZHANG Boyu
, LIANG Hua
. The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 64-76.
-
[2]
HE Da'an
, LI Huaizheng
. Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 54-63.
-
[3]
LIN Xifen
, FU Zhangyi
. How Does Public Trust in the Judiciary Shape Acceptability of Judges' AI-assisted Adjudications——An Empirical Study Based on Questionnaire Data. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 133-144.
-
[4]
ZHANG Jun
, FANG Hongsheng
. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 70-90.
-
[5]
LI Ting
. From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 143-156.
-
[6]
RAN Gaoran
. The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 117-128.
-
[7]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[8]
ZHANG Yi
. Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 29-40.
-
[9]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[10]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
[11]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: