《新青年》与新文化运动
作者简介:桑兵,浙江大学历史系教授(浙江杭州 310028)
摘要: 既往关于新文化运动的历史叙述,都以《新青年》为发端和动因,实则新文化运动是在五四运动之后,由国民党、江苏教育会联手发动,以延续五四风潮冲击段祺瑞和安福系的未竟之业,用文化运动的形式推动国民革命的社会运动。《新青年》同人中,除陈独秀、李大钊予以呼应鼓吹外,胡适明确表示不赞成,甚至认为使得新思潮运动变质,其余成员也不以群众性的社会政治运动为然,文字言论几乎没有响应,行动也相当疏离隔膜。只是在反击章士钊和学衡派的攻击时,对新文化运动有所辩护。不过,新文化运动思想上的确受《新青年》的影响,并将新思潮扩展到全国和社会各界,舆论又将《新青年》同人视为新文化运动的领袖,五四→新文化运动的历史顺序,变成新文化运动→五四运动的倒置叙述,掩盖了《新青年》内部分歧所体现的近代中国两种不同趋新取径的矛盾冲突。
New Youth and the New Culture Movement
- Available Online:
2020-05-01
Abstract: Abstract: In existing historical narratives, the New Culture Movement was motivated by the magazine New Youth (Xin Qingnian). But actually, the New Culture Movement was promoted by the Kuomintang and the Kiangsu Provincial Educational Association to continue the attack on Duan Qirui and the An Fu Clique after the May Fourth Movement. Thus, in essence, it was a social movement. Among the members of the New Youth, only Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao went with the tide and became advocates of the New Culture Movement. In contrast, Hu Shi opposed the New Culture Movement explicitly, and even blamed it for disrupting the New Thought Movement. Similarly, the other members also did not approve of the mass social and political movement. Consequently, except when Zhang Shizhao and the intellectuals of the Xue Heng School attacked the New Culture Movement fiercely, they rarely wrote or acted in response to it. However, the New Youth was influential in the New Culture Movement in terms of new thoughts. In return, the New Culture Movement contributed to the nation-wide flow of the new currents of thoughts (Xin Sichao). Moreover, public opinions at the time usually regarded the members of the New Youth as leaders of the New Culture Movement. Accordingly, later historians were misled about the historical sequence of the May Fourth Movement and the New Culture Movement, which resulted in neglect of the disagreements among the members of the New Youth and the contradictions between two ways of innovation and progress in modern China.