我国国际法研究的主体性缺失问题:反思与祛魅
Absence of Subjectivity in the Study of International Law in China: Reflection and Disenchantment
-
摘要: 我国在世界舞台上仍旧缺乏与其硬实力相匹配的国际话语权,为使国际法治中国话语得以生成与转化,必须要改进与提升我国国际法的解释能力。而欲求改进与提升此种能力,就需要解决我国当下国际法学研究存在的主体性缺失这一最大问题,对传统国际法观念及其所支撑的主流国际法研究范式进行深度祛魅。立足于当下我国的国际法研究现状,除了继续深入推动国际法理论与实务的有效对接与互动外,我们还应在基础层面改进国际法教科书的内容,逐渐增添其本土化的色彩。同时,在研究路径上,从内外两个基本维度着力,渐进实现国际法学科的“科内整合”与“科际整合”。Abstract: On the world stage, China still lacks the international discourse power commensurate with its hard power. In order to create the Chinese discourse on the International Rule of Law, it is necessary to improve the interpretive capacity of China’s international law, which requires approaching the fundamental problem of the lack of subjectivity in the study of international law in China at the present time as well as a deep disenchantment of traditional notions of international law and the mainstream international law study paradigms that underpin them. Based on the current status of international law study in China, we should, first of all, advocate focusing on the two basic dimensions of the study path. That is, both intra-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary integration of the discipline of international law should be gradually realized. Secondly, it should continue to promote the effective interaction between the theory and practice of international law. Lastly, the content of international law textbooks should be improved at the basic level and gradually become more and more localized.
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 1554
- HTML全文浏览量: 274