战略思维流变与美国霸权走势相关性分析

张一飞，吴白乙

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

March 2024

Article Contents

Citation: ZHANG Yifei. A Critical Analysis of Evoluted American Strategic Thinking and Its Impact on the U.S.Hegemony[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 84-95. shu

A Critical Analysis of Evoluted American Strategic Thinking and Its Impact on the U.S.Hegemony

ZHANG Yifei

Abstract

The American strategic thinking is composed of three schools,namely capital fundamentalism,spiritual imperialism and military superiority realism.The former represents the central argument,while the latter two play affliative and supplementary roles to influnce policies for sustaining the U.S.hegemony.Throughout a long-time evolution these schools have developed respective doctrines,goals and group interest.In the days they workd well with each other,their contests remained reasonably complimantary in translating state capability into capital appreciation.However,as spiritual imperialism and superiortiy realism overtook capitalist fundamentalism in practice,the true alienation of prioritizing “means” over “goals” occured.Since the 20th century American strategic thinking unvailed a steady process of disintegrity of the three schools,severly undermining their systematic and philosophical coherence that once backed up the U.S.global strategy.Due to its capitalist nature of indefinite expansion,the United States always faces the ambivlence caused by its contractionary interest-driven ambitions and growing containments in a rapidly-changing external environment.When its ability gets weaker or worse to nevigate through its mind confusion,the hegemony is doomed to decline.
- American strategic thinking,capital fundamentalism,spiritual imperialism,superiority realism,U.S.hegemony
References
Access
1. [1]
  Qingjie WANG . Peirce and the Start of the “Philosophy from USA”. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 48-57.
2. [2]
  Peiguo ZHANG . Rethinking on the Paradigm of “Capitalist Germination”. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 168-181.
3. [3]
  Guojun XIA . Naturalist and Anti-naturalist Fractals of American Philosophical Holism. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 45-59.
4. [4]
  Yinxing HONG . Capital in Socialist Market Economy: Attributes, Acts, and Norms. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 39-45.
5. [5]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 54-63.
6. [6]
  Jie ZHANG . Internal Logic and Formation Mechanism of Orderly Expansion of Socialist Capital with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 33-42.
7. [7]
  CHEN Tao . The Rule of Gentleman,Bourgeois Capitalism,and Republicanism—— The Unique Path of State-building in Early Modern England. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(9): 130-143.
8. [8]
  Yan MA , Lin WANG , Peixiang YANG . An Analysis about “the New Era of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics” based on Social Structure of Accumulation Theory. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 58-68.
9. [9]
  JIA Wenjuan . The Body of Labor, the Mind of Capital——Self Capitalization and the Formation of the Laborers Ideology in Late Neoliberalism. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 112-121.
10. [10]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 44-53.
11. [11]
  Xiaoyang WANG . Physicalism Is Not Equal to Physics-ism. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(5): 15-29.
12. [12]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 177-184.
13. [13]
  Yonghua LIU , Yufan SUN . The Structure of Relational Presentism. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 126-139.
14. [14]
  ZHANG Yibing . Capital:Towards Historical Materialism—— A Study of Forme,Fonction,Structure Dans Le Capital by Lefebvre. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(4): 66-79.
15. [15]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 34-43.
16. [16]
  , , , . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 5-32.
17. [17]
  Yongle ZHANG . The Transoceanic Travelling of the Monroe Doctrine. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 105-125.
18. [18]
  . Theory and Application of Discretism. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 98-114.
19. [19]
  Liuhua ZHANG . Inferentialism: Logic and Theory of Meaning. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 28-38.
20. [20]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 169-178.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 980 Times PDF downloads: 11 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(11)
Abstract views(980)
HTML views(113)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

A Critical Analysis of Evoluted American Strategic Thinking and Its Impact on the U.S.Hegemony

ZHANG Yifei

Abstract: The American strategic thinking is composed of three schools,namely capital fundamentalism,spiritual imperialism and military superiority realism.The former represents the central argument,while the latter two play affliative and supplementary roles to influnce policies for sustaining the U.S.hegemony.Throughout a long-time evolution these schools have developed respective doctrines,goals and group interest.In the days they workd well with each other,their contests remained reasonably complimantary in translating state capability into capital appreciation.However,as spiritual imperialism and superiortiy realism overtook capitalist fundamentalism in practice,the true alienation of prioritizing “means” over “goals” occured.Since the 20th century American strategic thinking unvailed a steady process of disintegrity of the three schools,severly undermining their systematic and philosophical coherence that once backed up the U.S.global strategy.Due to its capitalist nature of indefinite expansion,the United States always faces the ambivlence caused by its contractionary interest-driven ambitions and growing containments in a rapidly-changing external environment.When its ability gets weaker or worse to nevigate through its mind confusion,the hegemony is doomed to decline.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

A Critical Analysis of Evoluted American Strategic Thinking and Its Impact on the U.S.Hegemony

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

A Critical Analysis of Evoluted American Strategic Thinking and Its Impact on the U.S.Hegemony

HTML

目录