Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 3
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Jianping GAO. A Reflection on the Theory of “Sedimentation” and a Reinterpretation of “New Sensuousness”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 183-192. shu

A Reflection on the Theory of “Sedimentation” and a Reinterpretation of “New Sensuousness”

  • Despite its significant influence in contemporary Chinese aesthetics and philosophy, the theory of “sedimentation” has serious flaws. First of all, this theory upholds the idea that sensuousness is the result of the accumulation of reason, which has given rise to the excessive rationalization of aesthetics. Secondly, the sedimentation of content fails to take into consideration the unique origins of form which do not depend upon the content. Thirdly, “Practice” ought not to be understood as action being carried out according to reason, but as “sensuous activity”. The present article concludes with a discussion centered on “new sensuousness”, and argues that this concept can neither be seen as a “sensuous presentation of reason”, nor as a passionate outburst of primal instincts. “New sensuousness” is in fact an accumulation of sensuous experience, the renewal of sensuous vitality, and the interaction between sensuousness and reason.
  • 加载中

Article Metrics

Article views: 918 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(918)
  • HTML views(146)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        A Reflection on the Theory of “Sedimentation” and a Reinterpretation of “New Sensuousness”

        Abstract: Despite its significant influence in contemporary Chinese aesthetics and philosophy, the theory of “sedimentation” has serious flaws. First of all, this theory upholds the idea that sensuousness is the result of the accumulation of reason, which has given rise to the excessive rationalization of aesthetics. Secondly, the sedimentation of content fails to take into consideration the unique origins of form which do not depend upon the content. Thirdly, “Practice” ought not to be understood as action being carried out according to reason, but as “sensuous activity”. The present article concludes with a discussion centered on “new sensuousness”, and argues that this concept can neither be seen as a “sensuous presentation of reason”, nor as a passionate outburst of primal instincts. “New sensuousness” is in fact an accumulation of sensuous experience, the renewal of sensuous vitality, and the interaction between sensuousness and reason.

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return