代议制政府与代表制政府:一个理论和历史的比较
Representative Government and Representational Government: A Theoretical and Historical Perspective
-
摘要: 作为随着代表观念及其实践发展而来的一种委托代理政府形式,代议制和代表制同属现代政治,但两者的历史背景、制度原理、运行特征和价值偏好具有重要区别。代议制强调选举的授权功能,认为竞争性的自由选举是代表(议员)产生和政府施政的合法性基础,代表制则强调政府的回应性和可问责性,把能否有效反映和满足民众的客观需求作为政府好坏的根本标准。这两种不同的政府形式依托不同的代表理论、民主理论和授权−问责形式。中国代表制政府的双重代表结构是现代政治条件下中国国家治理制度化的一个重要特征。Abstract: The form of “principal-agent” government developed from representative notion and its practice. Representative system and representational system are both belong to modern politics, but also have significant distinction in historical background, institutional principle, operational characteristics and value preference. Representative system emphasizes on the authorization function of election, believe competitive free election is the foundation of generating representatives (members of parliament) and legitimacy of government policies. The representational system emphasizes on the responsiveness and accountability of the government. It takes account of whether the government is able to respond and meet the needs of people as the criteria of good governance. The two forms of government based on different kinds of representative theory, democratic theory and ‘authorization-accountability’ pattern. The dual representational structureof Chinese representational system is an important feature of the institutionalization of China’s national governance under modern political conditions.
-
表 1 代表制政府与代议制政府的侧重点
政府类型 代表制 代议制 代表的性质 政府是否具有代表性 代表(代议士)如何产生 施政的重心 政策是否反映人民的基本需求 选举与集团政治是否具有竞争性 制度的取向 政治制度是否产生诸如社会正义、
良治、福利、“民享”等实质效果政治制度是否带有诸如民权、自由、
正式制度与程序等形式特征注:王绍光:《中国政道》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014年,第192页。 -

计量
- 文章访问数: 2231
- HTML全文浏览量: 313