Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

 May 5,2025
Volume 55 Issue 12
December 2023
Article Contents

Citation: XIA Zhongyi. Poetry-History Modelling in the Perspective of Tang History and Tang Legends—— Doubting Qian Zhongshu’s Misjudgement on Chen Yinke[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 122-135. shu

Poetry-History Modelling in the Perspective of Tang History and Tang Legends—— Doubting Qian Zhongshu’s Misjudgement on Chen Yinke

  • Since 1940,in the field of “poetry-history” relationship,Chen Yinke and Qian Zhongshu have had their own paths of thought and poetic modelling.Chen has never denounced Qian’s poetic views,but Qian has been criticising Chen’s “poetic-historical” model for more than half a century.Since the new century,more and more scholars have been involved in this case,but most of them have taken the “poetry-history division” advocated by Qian as a criterion,without referring to Chen’s writings.The so-called “doubt” in this paper is willing to read the literature of Qian’s and Chen’s works on the same premise,pointing out that Qian’s “wrong judgement” of Chen is also rooted in Qian’s “high opinion” as a giant of poetics,while failing to make a systematic “exploration of the book” of Chen’s writings (especially the “Yuanbai Poetry Notes and Certificates”).

Article Metrics

Article views: 531 Times PDF downloads: 4 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(4)
  • Abstract views(531)
  • HTML views(83)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Poetry-History Modelling in the Perspective of Tang History and Tang Legends—— Doubting Qian Zhongshu’s Misjudgement on Chen Yinke

        Abstract: Since 1940,in the field of “poetry-history” relationship,Chen Yinke and Qian Zhongshu have had their own paths of thought and poetic modelling.Chen has never denounced Qian’s poetic views,but Qian has been criticising Chen’s “poetic-historical” model for more than half a century.Since the new century,more and more scholars have been involved in this case,but most of them have taken the “poetry-history division” advocated by Qian as a criterion,without referring to Chen’s writings.The so-called “doubt” in this paper is willing to read the literature of Qian’s and Chen’s works on the same premise,pointing out that Qian’s “wrong judgement” of Chen is also rooted in Qian’s “high opinion” as a giant of poetics,while failing to make a systematic “exploration of the book” of Chen’s writings (especially the “Yuanbai Poetry Notes and Certificates”).

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return