康德与黑格尔之间：马克思“抽象与具体”辩证法阐释路径转换及其限度

向南

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

May 2025

Article Contents

Citation: XIANG Nan. Between Kant and Hegel: Transformation and Limitation of the Interpretation Path of Marx's Dialectics of “Abstract and Concrete”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(5): 36-45,124. shu

Between Kant and Hegel: Transformation and Limitation of the Interpretation Path of Marx's Dialectics of “Abstract and Concrete”

XIANG Nan

Abstract

In current research, Hegelian dialectics is the main interpretive path of Marx's "Abstract and Concrete" dialectics, but it has caused conflicts between multiple research perspectives such as ontology, epistemology, and logic.The interpretive path should be appropriately shifted towards the Kantian transcendental logic.From the perspective of the unity of epistemology and logic, "from concrete to abstract" and "from abstract to concrete" should be regarded as the "two paths" of the dialectics of "Abstract and Concrete", and the subjective deduction of version A and the objective deduction of version B should be regarded as the "two paths" of the category's transcendental deduction.A comparative theoretical interpretation should be made between transcendental deduction and the dialectics of "Abstract and Concrete".Firstly, from the perspective of the generation process of theoretical structure, the two have formal external correlations and substantive differences in content in dimensions such as theoretical starting points, logical deduction methods, and epistemological construction paths.Secondly, from the perspective of the overall internal relationship of the theory, the two have both formal similarities and mutually exclusive content in the handling of relationships such as "two paths".Thirdly, the limitation of interpreting the path transformation lies in the "likely priori structure" between Kant and Hegel.The "Abstract and Concrete" dialectics combines the theoretical characteristics of the non-identity between the concept and the reality in ontology, as well as the unity of thought and existence epistemology.
- dialectics of "abstract and concrete",
- transcendental deduction,
- "two paths",
- Kant,
- Hegel
References
Access
1. [1]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
2. [2]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
3. [3]
  XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.
4. [4]
  CHEN Yinchi , WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.
5. [5]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
6. [6]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
7. [7]
  ZHANG Jun , FANG Hongsheng . Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 70-90.
8. [8]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
9. [9]
  LU Mingjun . Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 41-55.
10. [10]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
11. [11]
  LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.
12. [12]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
13. [13]
  LI Ming , XU Haiqi , XU Changtuo . A Statistical Framework and Measurement Results for Public Finance Investing in People. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 91-105.
14. [14]
  YANG Rui . Five Planet Conjunctions: Reinterpretation of the Celestial Phenomenon in 1007. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 207-216.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 1650 Times PDF downloads: 7 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(7)
Abstract views(1650)
HTML views(236)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Between Kant and Hegel: Transformation and Limitation of the Interpretation Path of Marx's Dialectics of “Abstract and Concrete”

XIANG Nan

Abstract: In current research, Hegelian dialectics is the main interpretive path of Marx's "Abstract and Concrete" dialectics, but it has caused conflicts between multiple research perspectives such as ontology, epistemology, and logic.The interpretive path should be appropriately shifted towards the Kantian transcendental logic.From the perspective of the unity of epistemology and logic, "from concrete to abstract" and "from abstract to concrete" should be regarded as the "two paths" of the dialectics of "Abstract and Concrete", and the subjective deduction of version A and the objective deduction of version B should be regarded as the "two paths" of the category's transcendental deduction.A comparative theoretical interpretation should be made between transcendental deduction and the dialectics of "Abstract and Concrete".Firstly, from the perspective of the generation process of theoretical structure, the two have formal external correlations and substantive differences in content in dimensions such as theoretical starting points, logical deduction methods, and epistemological construction paths.Secondly, from the perspective of the overall internal relationship of the theory, the two have both formal similarities and mutually exclusive content in the handling of relationships such as "two paths".Thirdly, the limitation of interpreting the path transformation lies in the "likely priori structure" between Kant and Hegel.The "Abstract and Concrete" dialectics combines the theoretical characteristics of the non-identity between the concept and the reality in ontology, as well as the unity of thought and existence epistemology.

HTML

Relative (14)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Between Kant and Hegel: Transformation and Limitation of the Interpretation Path of Marx's Dialectics of “Abstract and Concrete”

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Between Kant and Hegel: Transformation and Limitation of the Interpretation Path of Marx's Dialectics of “Abstract and Concrete”

HTML

目录