Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY，Today is

Chinese
Volume 57 Issue 5
May 2025
Article Contents

    Citation: CHEN Li and YUAN Jiahan. Economics Behind Art Conflict——A Reexamination of Ruskin-Whistler Lawsuit[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(5): 163-173,216. shu

    Economics Behind Art Conflict——A Reexamination of Ruskin-Whistler Lawsuit

    • Abstract

      The Ruskin-Whistler lawsuit is an important event in the history of Western art.While previous studies mostly focus on their different artistic views, this article points out that the artistic dispute can be traced back to deeper socio-economic reasons.It explores into the neglected social theory of Ruskin in his later period and resorts to Marxist economic theory as well the consumption culture theory, in order to re-examine this lawsuit from the interdisciplinary perspective of economics.The dispute between Ruskin and Whistler lies in their different concepts on art production and consumption when the society transited from the era of supply to that of consumption.Ruskin's economic theory focuses on the labor theory of value and conforms to Marxist economics.He believes that commodities have fixed intrinsic value and negates exchange value as well as consumerism, arguing that commodities should be priced according to the labor cost in production.Art differs from common commodities and undertakes the duty of promoting social morality.Whistler adapted himself to the changes of the times.His works gained public applause due to their avant-garde and novelty in a consumer society dominated by visual culture.His focus on form reflects the non-functional nature of commodities in the consumer era.Ruskin insists on the redemptive function of art, while Whistler's success marks the beginning of the era of the capitalization of aesthetics.
    • 加载中

    • References

    • Access

      1. [1]

        HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.

      2. [2]

        LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.

      3. [3]

        WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.

      4. [4]

        LU Mingjun . Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 41-55.

      5. [5]

        LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

      6. [6]

        RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.

      7. [7]

        NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

      8. [8]

        WAN Yong ,  LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

      9. [9]

        WANG Qian . AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 118-132.

      10. [10]

        WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Entire Issue PDF

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 1763 Times PDF downloads: 2 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    Metrics
    • PDF Downloads(2)
    • Abstract views(1763)
    • HTML views(256)
    • Latest
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          Economics Behind Art Conflict——A Reexamination of Ruskin-Whistler Lawsuit

          Abstract: The Ruskin-Whistler lawsuit is an important event in the history of Western art.While previous studies mostly focus on their different artistic views, this article points out that the artistic dispute can be traced back to deeper socio-economic reasons.It explores into the neglected social theory of Ruskin in his later period and resorts to Marxist economic theory as well the consumption culture theory, in order to re-examine this lawsuit from the interdisciplinary perspective of economics.The dispute between Ruskin and Whistler lies in their different concepts on art production and consumption when the society transited from the era of supply to that of consumption.Ruskin's economic theory focuses on the labor theory of value and conforms to Marxist economics.He believes that commodities have fixed intrinsic value and negates exchange value as well as consumerism, arguing that commodities should be priced according to the labor cost in production.Art differs from common commodities and undertakes the duty of promoting social morality.Whistler adapted himself to the changes of the times.His works gained public applause due to their avant-garde and novelty in a consumer society dominated by visual culture.His focus on form reflects the non-functional nature of commodities in the consumer era.Ruskin insists on the redemptive function of art, while Whistler's success marks the beginning of the era of the capitalization of aesthetics.

            HTML

          Relative (10)

          目录

          沪ICP备16024018号-1  沪公网安备 31010102003103号

          ICCAS
           Chinese Chemical Society

          Address： 邮政编码：200020

          Telephone：021－53060399、53069080 Email：xsyk021@163.com

          Supported by Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd Technical ： info@rhhz.net

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return