Citation:
ZHAI Yi. A New Discussion on the Justification Review Method of the Principle of Proportionality—— A Perspective that Integrates Law,Economics,and Negotiation Theory[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 107-119.
A New Discussion on the Justification Review Method of the Principle of Proportionality—— A Perspective that Integrates Law,Economics,and Negotiation Theory
-
Abstract
The lack of appropriate review methods has led to disputes over the hierarchy of the principle of legitimacy of purpose,as well as issues such as review misalignment,insufficient review,excessive subjectivity,and inaccuracy caused by some scholars simply copying the principle of reasonableness of common law to determine the inappropriate purpose in the principle of proportionality.The key to solving the problem lies in reconstructing the method of examining the legitimacy of the purpose.The principle of proportionality,the common methods of law and economics,and negotiation theory can be integrated to construct a new approach for examining the legitimacy of purposes.Starting from the “comparative” thinking,the purpose of examining the legitimacy of purposes can be classified into two categories: “the purpose of realizing (safeguarding) rights (interests)” and “the purpose of restricting rights (interests)”,and the corresponding objective and subjective content can be compared and examined.In the review process,the objective content corresponding to the purpose should be quantified and reviewed first,and then the subjective content corresponding to the purpose should be reviewed.In terms of examination standards,based on the improvement of Kaldor Hicks,the objective content corresponding to the legitimacy examination standard quantified by law and economics is that the value of “realization (protection)” is greater than “limitation”; The examination of subjective content corresponding to the purpose is achieved through equal and free negotiation.The objective and subjective content corresponding to the purpose has passed the legitimacy review,and the purpose is legitimate.By combining the advantages of the principle of proportionality and the principles of law and economics,and using the common “comparison” method of proportionality,law and economics,and negotiation theory as the connection point,we can better understand and practice the principle of proportionality.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[2]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[3]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
[4]
WANG Gang
. Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 206-216.
-
[5]
WEN Jun
. From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 145-156.
-
[6]
ZHAO Lin
, ZHANG Boyu
, LIANG Hua
. The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 64-76.
-
[7]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[8]
ZHANG Jun
, FANG Hongsheng
. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 70-90.
-
[9]
XU Xiangdong
. Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 5-15.
-
[10]
RAN Gaoran
. The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 117-128.
-
[11]
CHEN Yinchi
, WU Siqi
. Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 157-169.
-
[12]
LI Yushuan
. New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 170-180.
-
[13]
LI Ting
. From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 143-156.
-
[14]
YING Qi
. Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 23-31.
-
[15]
QIN Zhongliang
. Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 181-194.
-
[16]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[17]
HE Jun
. Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 56-69.
-
[18]
HU Jun
. Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 184-194.
-
[19]
LIN Xifen
, FU Zhangyi
. How Does Public Trust in the Judiciary Shape Acceptability of Judges' AI-assisted Adjudications——An Empirical Study Based on Questionnaire Data. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 133-144.
-
[20]
ZHANG Yi
. Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 29-40.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: