Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY，Today is

Chinese
Volume 57 Issue 6
June 2025
Article Contents

    Citation: HU Dengfeng, WU Hao and WANG Jiayi. Research on Government Adaptive Governance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence——A Three—Dimensional “Technology-Institution-Value” Analytical Framework[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(6): 83-94. shu

    Research on Government Adaptive Governance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence——A Three—Dimensional “Technology-Institution-Value” Analytical Framework

    • Abstract

      Different from one-dimensional technological instrumentalism or institutional change theory. The collaborative evolution of technological tool embeddedness, institutional structure adaptability, and value norm orientation is the inherent logic of government adaptive governance in the era of artificial intelligence. In terms of technology, the expansion of algorithmic power and the reconstruction of governance authority through data monopolies have led to the risk of "technological Leviathan"; The institutional dimension needs to break through bureaucratic rigidity and achieve dynamic adjustment through flexible legislation and organizational innovation; The value dimension emphasizes the ethical domestication of instrumental rationality through the principles of fairness, transparency, and humanism. Through case studies, it was further discovered that China has actually formed a governance paradigm of integrating technology into the socialization system. The technology system is no longer seen as an independent variable external to the social structure, but is organically integrated into the national governance system, becoming an endogenous driving force for the evolution of social forms.
    • 加载中

    • References

    • Access

      1. [1]

        WANG Qian . AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 118-132.

      2. [2]

        LIN Xifen ,  FU Zhangyi . How Does Public Trust in the Judiciary Shape Acceptability of Judges' AI-assisted Adjudications——An Empirical Study Based on Questionnaire Data. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 133-144.

      3. [3]

        YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

      4. [4]

        YOU Yang . How Does AI Understand Language Meaning. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 16-28.

      5. [5]

        HE Da'an ,  LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.

      6. [6]

        WAN Yong ,  LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

      7. [7]

        ZHANG Yi . Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 29-40.

      8. [8]

        SUO Liming ,  WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

      9. [9]

        XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.

      10. [10]

        XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Entire Issue PDF

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 3478 Times PDF downloads: 23 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    Metrics
    • PDF Downloads(23)
    • Abstract views(3478)
    • HTML views(476)
    • Latest
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          Research on Government Adaptive Governance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence——A Three—Dimensional “Technology-Institution-Value” Analytical Framework

          Abstract: Different from one-dimensional technological instrumentalism or institutional change theory. The collaborative evolution of technological tool embeddedness, institutional structure adaptability, and value norm orientation is the inherent logic of government adaptive governance in the era of artificial intelligence. In terms of technology, the expansion of algorithmic power and the reconstruction of governance authority through data monopolies have led to the risk of "technological Leviathan"; The institutional dimension needs to break through bureaucratic rigidity and achieve dynamic adjustment through flexible legislation and organizational innovation; The value dimension emphasizes the ethical domestication of instrumental rationality through the principles of fairness, transparency, and humanism. Through case studies, it was further discovered that China has actually formed a governance paradigm of integrating technology into the socialization system. The technology system is no longer seen as an independent variable external to the social structure, but is organically integrated into the national governance system, becoming an endogenous driving force for the evolution of social forms.

            HTML

          Relative (10)

          目录

          沪ICP备16024018号-1  沪公网安备 31010102003103号

          ICCAS
           Chinese Chemical Society

          Address： 邮政编码：200020

          Telephone：021－53060399、53069080 Email：xsyk021@163.com

          Supported by Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd Technical ： info@rhhz.net

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return