Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 51 Issue 12
January 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Taihui GUO. Sources of Methodological Differentiation Within Historical Sociology[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 81-94. shu

Sources of Methodological Differentiation Within Historical Sociology

  • Historical sociology returned to the academic trend after Second World War while such remarkable figures as Charles Tilly and Skocpol are concerned about the methodological differentiation within historical sociology, yet, not searching for its sources and causes. In fact, once historical sociology rose in 19th century, its methodology is separated into three types and traditions. The first is to explain the present problems and find the rule of social change; the second is to deeply narrate the speciality of historical process; the third is to interpret the complexity of historical change with the sociological concepts and methods. Such differentiation has a decisive effect on the development of historical sociology in 20th​​​​​​​ century. There are two attitudes toward the differentiation, that is, integration and suspension, which cause the methodology of historical sociology in dispute.
  • 加载中

Figures(1) / Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views: 2125 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(2125)
  • HTML views(207)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          Sources of Methodological Differentiation Within Historical Sociology

          Abstract: Historical sociology returned to the academic trend after Second World War while such remarkable figures as Charles Tilly and Skocpol are concerned about the methodological differentiation within historical sociology, yet, not searching for its sources and causes. In fact, once historical sociology rose in 19th century, its methodology is separated into three types and traditions. The first is to explain the present problems and find the rule of social change; the second is to deeply narrate the speciality of historical process; the third is to interpret the complexity of historical change with the sociological concepts and methods. Such differentiation has a decisive effect on the development of historical sociology in 20th​​​​​​​ century. There are two attitudes toward the differentiation, that is, integration and suspension, which cause the methodology of historical sociology in dispute.

            HTML

          Figure (1)  Table (1)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return