“此花颜色一时明白起来”——阳明“心物关系说”的美学意涵与现代回响
作者简介:刘锋杰,浙江越秀外国语学院教授(浙江绍兴312030),苏州大学文学院教授(江苏苏州 215031)。
摘要: 王阳明反对朱熹的“理本体”,主张“心本体”,在心物关系中通过“意义世界”之视域解释审美现象,“岩花问答”体现了这一点:心物交融创造审美世界,从而使审美活动明白与敞亮起来,且又时时变化而造成审美的无限可能性。中国现代美学更多地受西方哲学中唯物与唯心对立思想的影响,但深入“美是主客观的统一说”“美是客观说”“美是评价说”等观点去看,亦能观察到与阳明“心物关系说”的内在关联性。其中,刘师培代表传统的心物关系说向现代的主客观统一说的理论转型,梁启超、王国维、宗白华等人既论心物关系又论主客关系,朱光潜立足于心物关系而完成“美是主客观统一”的理论新构,李泽厚等人的“美是客观说”强化了审美中的物性一维,却不免忽略了审美中的心体一维。其他的“美是评价说”“美是体验说”“存在论实践美学”等都构成与阳明心物关系说的深刻对话,证明中国现代美学之创构与中国古典美学思想之间的内生性是不言而喻的。
“The Flower's Color Become Lucid Immediately”——The Aesthetic Implications and Modern Reverberations of Wang Yangming's “Mind-Thing Relationship”
Abstract: Wang Yangming rejected Zhu Xi's ontology "li (理)-as-substance" and proposed "mind as noumenon", instead. Through the lens of the"the world of meaning", he reinterpreted aesthetic phenomena within the mind-thing relationship. His cliff-flower dialogue conveys this:the fusion of mind and object creates an aesthetic world, where in aesthetic activities achieve lucidity and illumination, while perpetual change engenders infinite aesthetic possibilities. Modern Chinese aesthetics was influenced by the opposing ideologies of materialism and idealism in Western philosophy. However, a deeper exploration into viewpoints such as "beauty as the unity of subject and object", "beauty as objective", and "beauty as evaluation" reveals an intrinsic connection with Yangming's theory. Liu Shipei pioneered the transition from the classical mind-thing relation to modern subject-object unity. Liang Qichao, Wang Guowei, and Zong Baihua bridged mind-thing and subject-object paradigms. Zhu Guangqian synthesized these into the theory "beauty as unity of subject and object". Li Zehou's "beauty as objective" emphasized materiality but overlooked the mind's role, while theories like "beauty as evaluation", "beauty as experience" and "ontological practical aesthetics" deepened dialogue with Yangming's legacy. This demonstrates the endogenous continuity between classical and modern Chinese aesthetics.