潘知常生命美学“信仰转向”现象批判
Criticism of “Belief Turn” in Life Aesthetics Proposed by Pan Zhichang
-
摘要: 潘知常以“生命美学”的代表而著称,新世纪以来更大力提倡为中国美学补上“信仰之维、爱之维”,其思想、言说为刘小枫所代表的“诗化神学”美学诠释之延续,自有“神性启蒙”的现代性意义,也因此而同染以二元对立思维扬西贬中之弊。此实为当代学人所共有之长短,似不必苛责。但潘先生经常自诩、四处“讲道”,却放大了其知识上的欠缺和学理上的轻率,也使得他的“生命美学”“信仰”和“爱”,远离了肉身与灵魂的沉重,成为消费时代的时尚,浮华为空洞美丽的辞藻、无所不能的爱之“心灵鸡汤”。“布道”所指高远,结果却失之浅近,虽有浮华时代之因,但既以“信仰”与“宣道”为己任,恐首先当自省。Abstract: Pan Zhichang, famous as a representative of “life aesthetics”, has been advocating the addition of “dimensions of belief and love” to the Chinese aesthetics since the inception of the new century. His thinking and words inherit the aesthetic interpretation of “poetic theology”, represented by Liu Xiaofeng, which makes them relevant in the view of modernity with their “theological enlightenment” but also infects them with a drawback of praising Western aesthetics and belittling the Chinese one in a concept of binary opposite. It is plausibly understandable because of its commonality among contemporary scholars. But Pan always acts as a self-claimed authority and “preaches” around, which not only amplifies academic shortage and theoretical imprudence, but deviates his didactic writings on “life aesthetics” as well as preaches of “belief ” and “love” from the gravity of flesh and soul, making his writings reduced to fast fashion in this consumption era, florid and empty rhetoric, and omnipotent “chicken soup for the soul” with love. “Preach” is distorted into something shallow and narrow when it should refer to something lofty and distant. Beyond reproach as he is in such a time of vanity, self-reflection should be a priority now that he tasks himself with “advocating belief ” and “preaching”.
-
Key words:
- life aesthetics /
- love and belief /
- belief turn /
- Pan Zhichang /
- Liu Xiaofeng
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 1664
- HTML全文浏览量: 272