环保税制改革与雾霾协同治理

陈诗一; 武英涛

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

December 2018

Article Contents

Citation: Shiyi CHEN and Yingtao WU. Reform of Environmental Tax and the Collaborative Governance of Haze[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 39-57. shu

Reform of Environmental Tax and the Collaborative Governance of Haze

Shiyi CHEN ,
Yingtao WU

Fudan University School of Economics, Shanghai 200433

Abstract

Environmental protection tax is a great tool for controlling pollution such as haze. However, the latest environmental taxs’ plan announced in 2018 has been questioned as to whether it can effectively promote local haze pollution control and inter-regional collaborative governance. For this reason, the paper measures the marginal cost of smog control by estimating the shadow prices of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and smoke dust, which are the main sources of haze, in order to analyze the problems and optimization directions of environmental taxation reform in China. The study found that the shadow price of air pollution emissions in China has continued to increase substantially since 2005, so that the environmental protection tax standard can’t be simply " tax-tax shift” and a stage-by-stage upgrade mechanism should be established.Among them, the nitrogen oxides’ environmental protection tax is relative to sulfur dioxide and Dust and dust are extremely low.And as a focus of future emission reductions, there should be substantial adjustments.
- shadow price,
- environmental tax,
- collaborative governance,
- haze
References
Access
1. [1]
  Haijun CAO , Sai LIANG . The Key Code of Understanding “the Governance of China”: “Collaborative Advantage” and “Advantageous Collaboration”. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(4): 81-91.
2. [2]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 83-92.
3. [3]
  Weisen . Why Friedrich von Hayek Won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences—— A Rereading of Prices and ProductionLI. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(8): 37-55.
4. [4]
  Jianxing YU , Yindong LIU . The Supervision System in Vertical Inter-Governmental Relationship: Taking Central Environmental Protection Supervision as a Case. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 69-80.
5. [5]
  Zhiyang LIU , Yongchang CHEN . Social Enterprise’ Hybrid Logic and Cross-sectoral Collaboration. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 85-98.
6. [6]
  Conglai FAN , Jian LIN , Yijiang CHENG . Macro Prudential Management and Micro Prudential Regulatory: Construction of Policy Coordination Mechanism. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 35-45.
7. [7]
  Da’an HE . Network Cooperation in Investment and Management of Enterprises in the Internet Age. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 32-40.
8. [8]
  WANG Ye . Horizontal Power Structure and Local government Responsiveness: Division and Coordination. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(2): 103-114.
9. [9]
  Xuedong YANG , Jian YAN . Governance Edging out Representation?. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 59-67.
10. [10]
  Jianyong FENG . “Diplomatizing” the Border Governance. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 186-198.
11. [11]
  Ping FU . Creating Leading-edge Integrated Governance: The Governance Innovation of Poverty Alleviation in China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 121-131.
12. [12]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 66-80.
13. [13]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 88-98.
14. [14]
  Zhao CHEN . Industrial Policies with Great Power Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 46-57, 82.
15. [15]
  Mingke SHENG , Yong LIU . How Burnout of Grassroots Bureaucracy be Generated. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 114-126.
16. [16]
  Xuefeng HE , Hua GUI . Administrative Incentives and the Logic of Rural Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 126-137.
17. [17]
  Guozheng CHEN , Qiu ZHU . Dynamic Evolution of Modern Urban Governance Mechanisms Research. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 86-95, 122.
18. [18]
  CUI Yongdong . The Concept and Method of Social Governance Cut in and Penetrate into Compliance Governance. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(4): 138-147.
19. [19]
  Yao CHEN , Tiantian CHEN . How Systems Produce Governance Effciency: 70-Years Experience in China’s National Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 86-94.
20. [20]
  GUO Chunzhen . From Embedding to Convergence:The Relationship and Optimization between Technological Governance and Legal Governance. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(12): 100-111.

Figures(9) / Tables(9)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 5362 Times PDF downloads: 26 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(26)
Abstract views(5362)
HTML views(673)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Reform of Environmental Tax and the Collaborative Governance of Haze

Shiyi CHEN
Yingtao WU

Fudan University School of Economics, Shanghai 200433

Available Online: 2018-10-01

Abstract: Environmental protection tax is a great tool for controlling pollution such as haze. However, the latest environmental taxs’ plan announced in 2018 has been questioned as to whether it can effectively promote local haze pollution control and inter-regional collaborative governance. For this reason, the paper measures the marginal cost of smog control by estimating the shadow prices of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and smoke dust, which are the main sources of haze, in order to analyze the problems and optimization directions of environmental taxation reform in China. The study found that the shadow price of air pollution emissions in China has continued to increase substantially since 2005, so that the environmental protection tax standard can’t be simply " tax-tax shift” and a stage-by-stage upgrade mechanism should be established.Among them, the nitrogen oxides’ environmental protection tax is relative to sulfur dioxide and Dust and dust are extremely low.And as a focus of future emission reductions, there should be substantial adjustments.