歧义纷呈的“漩涡”:1930年代中国“现代派”的生成与流变
作者简介:高世蒙,复旦大学中文系博士研究生(上海 200433)
摘要: 1930年代,围绕施蛰存主编的《现代》出现了两个创作群体,即“现代派”诗人和“新感觉派”作家。这两支队伍在人员构成和创作风格上多有交叉重叠。经由30年代文学场的合力构造,尤其是左翼阶级话语的反向定义,它们逐渐被典范化为与现实主义判然二分的形式主义流派,并在此后峻急的政治形势下淡出文学舞台。80年代学界以“现代派”的名义重新发掘“新感觉派”,将其追认为文学史上首个现代主义流派。至此,30年代诗歌领域的“现代派”和小说领域的“新感觉派”成员合流,形成以施蛰存、戴望舒、杜衡、刘呐鸥、穆时英为核心成员的“现代派”。在新时期为这一流派清理历史浮尘和正名重建的过程中,或受制于历史遗留观念的影响,或出于意识形态站位的需要,其初始内蕴有时也可能发生位移,形成新的遮蔽。
An Ambiguous School: The Formation and Transformation of Chinese “Modernists” in the 1930s
- Available Online:
2022-05-20
Abstract: In the 1930s, two groups emerged around the magazine Modern edited by Shi Zhecun, namely “Modernists” in the field of poetry and “Neo-sensationalists” in the field of fiction. These two group soverlapped in membership and writing style. Through the joint efforts of literary field, especially the reverse definition from the Left-wing, the two were shaped into formalism distinct from realism, and then faded from the literary scene under the harsh political situation. In the 1980s, the academic community rediscovered “Neo-sensationalists” under the name of “Modernists” and subsequently certified it as the first Chinese modernism school. Thus, modernism poets and neo-sensationalism writers of the 1930s merged to form a school of “Modernists” with Shi Zhecun, Dai Wangshu, Du Heng, Liu Na’ou and Mu Shiying as its core members. In the process of rebuilding this school, its initial connotation may sometimes change or even form another kind of obscuration due to the influence of historical legacy concepts or the need for an ideological stance.