论经验法则在刑事司法裁判中的论证
On the Argumentation of the Empirical Laws in Criminal Judicial Decision
-
摘要: 经验法则在刑事司法裁判中的整体应用水平未达预期,主要体现在有效论证不足。经验法则应用的整体目标主要在于验证事实而非发现事实;个案中经验法则应用的可预期论证目标主要在于判断证据能力、评价证据证明力、支持或否定事实推论以及事实归属论证等方面。经验法则功能的限度也决定了论证方向的限制,其不能代替证据作为事实认定依据,亦不能作为刑事案件证明标准。经验法则的应用必须遵守一定的论证规则。除了基础的逻辑规则与语用规则之外,可根据经验法则的盖然性、主观性程度来分配其论证负担,以实现对事实争点的决疑目标。经验法则的有效应用不仅有利于案件事实的认定,且可以使其作为“好的理由”进入司法过程,实质性丰富司法裁判的论据来源与论证方式。Abstract: The empirical laws are applied at a relatively low level in criminal justice, which is mainly reflected in the lack of effective justification. The whole purpose of applying empirical laws is to justify facts rather than finding them. Empirical laws play important roles in judging the capacity of evidence, evaluating the weight of evidence, supporting or denying the factual presumption and the attributing argumentation. The limit of the function of empirical laws determines the direction of argumentation. The empirical laws are neither substitute of evidences, nor standard of proof in criminal justice. In addition to obey the basic logic and pragmatics rules, the burden of argumentation can be assigned according to the probability and subjectivity of empirical rules, so as to reach the goal of resolving factual doubts. The effective application of empirical laws is not only conducive to the case fact finding, but also can make it into the judicial process as “good reasons”, so as to substantially enrich the sources of argument grounds and the patterns of legal argumentation.
-
Key words:
- empirical laws /
- written judgment /
- criminal justice /
- fact finding
-
表 1 经验法则问题提出的主体与场景
刑事附带民事诉讼原告 被告 辩护人意见 检察机关 法 院 裁判文书事实认定 裁判文书“本院认为” 刑事附带民事赔偿 数量 2 22 105 26 170 88 27 占比 0.4% 5.0% 23.9% 5.9% 38.7% 20.0% 6.1% -

计量
- 文章访问数: 1331
- HTML全文浏览量: 99