平台型政府的“重层嵌套”组织结构及其制度逻辑

余敏江; 王磊

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2022

Article Contents

Citation: Minjiang YU and Lei WANG. The “Overlapping-layer Nesting” Organizational Structure and Institutional Logic of the Platform Government[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 73-85. shu

The “Overlapping-layer Nesting” Organizational Structure and Institutional Logic of the Platform Government

Minjiang YU ,
Lei WANG

Abstract

With the diffusion of platform technology, platform government is becoming a new government pattern and surpasses traditional bureaucratic system. Platform government is a structured and compound organizational form that integrates technical elements, governance functions and bureaucratic organization. It takes “overlapping-layer nesting” as organizational structure and “bureaucracy-oriented subject and platform-guided instrument” as organizational form, achieving response to personalized, diversified and complex social appeals through “three-in-one” operation mechanism of “service-based governance network fore-end” “technology-based resource sharing middle-end” and “institution-based power flow back-end”. The emergence and operation of platform government is one kind of strategic organizational innovation which embodies loose coupling of “subject” and “instrument”. In essence, this strategic organizational structure presents the pursuit of allocative efficiency of institutional nesting periodically. Therefore, in order to realize in-depth integration of platform technology and bureaucratic organization, prolong operational efficiency from the time dimension and realize adaptive efficiency of combining “temporary need” and “long-term method”, seeking solutions from tangled institutional system construction is necessary.
- technological politics,
- platform government,
- “overlapping-layer nesting”,
- adaptive efficiency
References
Access
1. [1]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(01): 30-45.
2. [2]
  Yucheng LIANG , Jia YIN . Proactivity and Reactivity: Study on China’s Skilled Migration Policies. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 135-148.
3. [3]
  LU Zhipeng . General Government and Functional Separation of Power Theory—— A theoretical construction based on contemporary Chinese government and political practice. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(12): 73-85.
4. [4]
  Xue LIU . Caring Government: A Study of the Grass-roots Government’s Role in Industrial Governance. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 127-137, 216.
5. [5]
  Dianfan YU , Hong JIANG , Lei CHEN . The Non-linear Relationship between Automated Capital Biased Technical Change and Employment. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 60-72.
6. [6]
  HAN Wenlong . The New Employment Form of Platform Economy and the Deconstruction of Its Economic Relationship—— A Political Economics Analysis. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(6): 63-74.
7. [7]
  Demin DUAN . Reconsidering the Conflicts and Polarization in American Politics. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 93-102.
8. [8]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 178-184.
9. [9]
  Xianliang FENG . People as the Core of Clan: The Kingship Network and Political Changes of the Qian’s Family in Weitang During the Transition Period from Ming to Qing Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 149-163.
10. [10]
  WANG Zhengxu . What is Good Government—— East Asian Peoples Evaluation of Government Legitimacy and Competence. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(10): 75-87.
11. [11]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(05): 56-62.
12. [12]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 51-57.
13. [13]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 113-119.
14. [14]
  Feng REN . The research on Chinese Political Tradition and the Possibility of Historical Politics. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 73-83.
15. [15]
  HUANGFU Xin， CHEN Guoquan . Self-reform Politics and Functional Separation of Power Theory. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 68-76.
16. [16]
  Guoquan CHEN . Economic Foundation, Government Form and Functional Separation Theory. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 66-74.
17. [17]
  Zhongqi WANG . Dispatched Responsibilty: An Effective Mechanism of Responsive Government Construction. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 84-95, 120.
18. [18]
  WANG Ye . Horizontal Power Structure and Local government Responsiveness: Division and Coordination. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(2): 103-114.
19. [19]
  Zhiping HU . Political Economy of the Change of Rural Public Service Supply in China: Development Stage and Government Behavior Framework. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 53-63.
20. [20]
  Qifu LIN , Hao YIN . Reconsidering Internet Political Participation: A Perspective of Representativeness. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(10): 77-88.

Figures(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 1807 Times PDF downloads: 9 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(9)
Abstract views(1807)
HTML views(456)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The “Overlapping-layer Nesting” Organizational Structure and Institutional Logic of the Platform Government

Minjiang YU
Lei WANG

Available Online: 2022-09-20

Abstract: With the diffusion of platform technology, platform government is becoming a new government pattern and surpasses traditional bureaucratic system. Platform government is a structured and compound organizational form that integrates technical elements, governance functions and bureaucratic organization. It takes “overlapping-layer nesting” as organizational structure and “bureaucracy-oriented subject and platform-guided instrument” as organizational form, achieving response to personalized, diversified and complex social appeals through “three-in-one” operation mechanism of “service-based governance network fore-end” “technology-based resource sharing middle-end” and “institution-based power flow back-end”. The emergence and operation of platform government is one kind of strategic organizational innovation which embodies loose coupling of “subject” and “instrument”. In essence, this strategic organizational structure presents the pursuit of allocative efficiency of institutional nesting periodically. Therefore, in order to realize in-depth integration of platform technology and bureaucratic organization, prolong operational efficiency from the time dimension and realize adaptive efficiency of combining “temporary need” and “long-term method”, seeking solutions from tangled institutional system construction is necessary.

HTML

Figure (1) Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

The “Overlapping-layer Nesting” Organizational Structure and Institutional Logic of the Platform Government

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

The “Overlapping-layer Nesting” Organizational Structure and Institutional Logic of the Platform Government

HTML

目录