Citation:
MA Yan. Political Economics Analysis of “Algorithm Revolution”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 66-74.
Political Economics Analysis of “Algorithm Revolution”
-
Abstract
As a productivity revolution that surpasses previous technological innovation, the “algorithm revolution” reshapes the productivity elements and their internal structure formed since the industrial revolution. That is, digital labor has become a new form of human labor; data has become a new object of labor for human production activities; digital means of labor has become the latest form of the evolution of human means of labor. However, under the leadership of private ownership, capitalism still takes plundering surplus value as the fundamental goal, and cannot form a real transformation of advanced production relations conducive to the progress of productive forces, and has formed algorithm monitoring in capitalist labor relations, algorithm monopoly in exchange relations, new inequality in distribution relations, and algorithm discrimination in consumption relations. The socialist system with Chinese characteristics based on public ownership and the “algorithmic revolution” have the unified progressiveness and dynamic adaptability, which provides the way for the development of the “algorithmic revolution”.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
ZHANG Jun
, FANG Hongsheng
. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 70-90.
-
[2]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[3]
ZHAO Lin
, ZHANG Boyu
, LIANG Hua
. The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 64-76.
-
[4]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[5]
WANG Gang
. Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 206-216.
-
[6]
WEN Jun
. From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 145-156.
-
[7]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[8]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
[9]
LU Mingjun
. Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 41-55.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: