Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 55 Issue 4
May 2023
Article Contents

Citation: Ye’an ZHOU and Haiyan ZHANG. The Evolution of Behavioral Economics over Half a Century: The Historical Trajectory of Paradigm Shift[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 91-99. shu

The Evolution of Behavioral Economics over Half a Century: The Historical Trajectory of Paradigm Shift

  • The evolution from old behavioral economics to modern behavioral economics is essentially the formation of a new theoretical paradigm. Old behavioral economics attempts to interpret some economic phenomena from a psychological perspective, but lacks a complete and independent theoretical logic system. Modern behavioral economics seems to originate from old behavioral economics, but it is fundamentally different from it. Modern behavioral economics inherits the analysis and related thoughts from the psychological perspective of the old behavioral economics, but does not reject the neoclassical economics at the same time. Instead, on the basis of the theoretical paradigm of neoclassical economics, it introduces human sociality, and constructs a complete theoretical logic system based on the assumption of bounded rationality. Compared with neoclassical economics, this theoretical system has different assumptions of rationality and human nature, which means that there are essential differences in the theoretical core. In this sense, modern behavioral economics has built its own new paradigm, which is also compatible with neoclassical economics. This is also the key reason why modern behavioral economics can bring different degrees of change to the existing branches of economics.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Defeng WANGMinqi ZHANG . On the Non-Historical Nature of Economics. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 22-35.

    2. [2]

      Jijun TANG . The Evolution and Behavioral Turn of Development Economics and Its Contemporary Implications. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 49-59.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(07): 5-19.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 5-15.

    5. [5]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 60-68.

    6. [6]

      Yibing ZHANGFugong ZHANGWeiyu KONGTing WU . Economic Discourse and the Formation of Historical Materialism (Symposium). Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 5-10.

    7. [7]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 178-184.

    8. [8]

      Zhiping HU . Political Economy of the Change of Rural Public Service Supply in China: Development Stage and Government Behavior Framework. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 53-63.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 64-79.

    10. [10]

      ZHANG Jun . Economics of Transition and China’s Experience. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(6): 38-47.

    11. [11]

      Jiaxin ZHOU . Critical Economics and Philosophy of Praxis. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(3): 17-25.

    12. [12]

      Chusheng YEZhaoke REN . The Network Analysis in Economics and the Economic Research of the Network. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(5): 39-46, 38.

    13. [13]

      Ming CHEN . Introduction to Political Economy of China’s Rural Modernization. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 72-84.

    14. [14]

      ZHANG Yibin . Exchange-Value: From the Usefulness of “For People”to the Equivalence of “For Money”— A Reexamination of Marx’s Economic Manuscripts 1857-1858. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 5-16.

    15. [15]

      Shuguang ZHANGChi ZHANG . Institution Economics of the Right. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 40-51, 83.

    16. [16]

      Ye’an ZHOU . Is Economics Seeking a New Micro Basis. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(12): 30-41.

    17. [17]

      TANG Jijun . The Rise of New Institutional Economics and Its Relationship with Neoclassical Economics. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(4): 128-137.

    18. [18]

      Xudong CHENLin CHENG . Inheritance and Innovation of Traditional Chinese Economic Thought and the Construction of Chinese Economics in New Era. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 56-68.

    19. [19]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 85-93.

    20. [20]

      Ming LU . For Long-term, Overall and Multidimensional Development: The Political Economy of China Road. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 58-71, 109.

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views: 1294 Times PDF downloads: 7 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(7)
  • Abstract views(1294)
  • HTML views(284)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          The Evolution of Behavioral Economics over Half a Century: The Historical Trajectory of Paradigm Shift

          Abstract: The evolution from old behavioral economics to modern behavioral economics is essentially the formation of a new theoretical paradigm. Old behavioral economics attempts to interpret some economic phenomena from a psychological perspective, but lacks a complete and independent theoretical logic system. Modern behavioral economics seems to originate from old behavioral economics, but it is fundamentally different from it. Modern behavioral economics inherits the analysis and related thoughts from the psychological perspective of the old behavioral economics, but does not reject the neoclassical economics at the same time. Instead, on the basis of the theoretical paradigm of neoclassical economics, it introduces human sociality, and constructs a complete theoretical logic system based on the assumption of bounded rationality. Compared with neoclassical economics, this theoretical system has different assumptions of rationality and human nature, which means that there are essential differences in the theoretical core. In this sense, modern behavioral economics has built its own new paradigm, which is also compatible with neoclassical economics. This is also the key reason why modern behavioral economics can bring different degrees of change to the existing branches of economics.

            HTML

          Table (1) Relative (20)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return