以自由为归宿:比较文明视野中的儒家自由观
作者简介:任剑涛,清华大学社会科学学院教授(北京100084)。
摘要: 从比较文明的视角看,人们一般认定,中西文明的根本差异是追求或是不追求自由。由于中国文明缺少对自由的明确命名、理论阐释与制度实践,因此被认为是一种不自由的文明形态。这是一个误解。一切文明形式的出现与维续,都以自由为前提条件。自由缺席,则文明不可能发生。作为中国古代文明精神主干的儒家,贡献了心性、限权、经济与人己权界四方面的自由思想,从而让中国古代保有了文明所需的必要自由思想资源。在古今之变的参照系中审视,儒家自由观是一种古典文明的自由观,呈现出惯习层面自由的特点,尚未抵达观念自觉、阐释清晰、制度夯实的境界。它需要经由一场结构性转变,以现代自由原则释放个人、依宪治国、强化社会,以此为中国现代文明建构扎牢自由的根基。
Freedom as the End:The Confucian Concept of Freedom from the Perspective of Comparative Civilization
Abstract: From a comparative civilizational perspective,it is commonly asserted that the fundamental difference between Chinese and Western civilizations lies in the pursuit or non-pursuit of freedom.Due to the absence of explicit naming,theoretical interpretation,and institutional practice of freedom in Chinese civilization,it is often deemed as a non-free form of civilization.This is a misconception.The emergence and sustenance of all civilizational forms are predicated on freedom.Without freedom,civilization cannot happen.As the spiritual backbone of ancient Chinese civilization,Confucianism has contributed to the thoughts of freedom from realms of xin xing(mind and nature,“心性”),limitation of power,economy,and boundaries of rights between self and others,thereby preserving the necessary intellectual resources of freedom for civilization in ancient China.Examining within the framework of the transformation from ancient to modern times,Confucian conception of freedom represents a classical form of freedom,characterized by habitual practices and not yet reaching the level of conscious awareness,clear interpretation,and solid institutional foundations.It requires a structural transformation to release individuals,govern according to the constitution,and strengthen society through modern principles of freedom,thereby firmly establishing the foundation of freedom in the construction of modern Chinese civilization.