汉语−思想秩序与上古神灵系统

韩水法

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

Volume 55 Issue 4

May 2023

Article Contents

Citation: Shuifa HAN. Hanese-Thought Order and Ancient System of Gods[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 45-71. shu

Hanese-Thought Order and Ancient System of Gods

Shuifa HAN

Abstract

The Hanese-thought order is a problematic, rich and fundamentally important area of research in the Hanese philosophy today, and it is also shown to be a fruitful method. Starting from this point and taking it as principle, the reexamination of ancient Hanese thought clarifies and recovers the spirit world of ancient Hanese, including its two main components, the system of gods and the system of mind. By analyzing and tracing the connections between the core words of the system of gods and their changes, the corresponding conceptual order and the changes of this order are sorted out, revealing the main structure of ancient Hanese thought and its major changes. Gu Jiegang denies that the system of gods was the fundamental factor and the main pillar of the social system throughout ancient Hanese thought because he lacks an effective method to clearly understand the binding nature of the Hanese-thought order; Yu Yingshi’s misjudgment of the relationship between humans and gods and the “eliminating the commonality between earth and heaven” in ancient Hanese is also due to his inappropriate methods and models that fail to comprehensively understand the direct connection between the word-thought-social order in ancient Hannese, and cannot pertinently grasp the ultimate intention of the systems of gods and mind in ancient Hanese.
- The order of Hanese-thought,
- the spirit world,
- the system of gods,
- the system of mind,
- Heaven,
- ghost-gods,
- transcendence,
- the live
References
Access
1. [1]
  Lizhi HUANG . The Concept of Being Systematic Is the Fundamental Way of Thought and Work in the New Era. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 5-16.
2. [2]
  Zhen WU . On the Systematical Construction of Yangming’s Liangzhi Theory. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 11-22.
3. [3]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 58-69.
4. [4]
  Licheng QIAN . Memory Studies: Beyond the Nation State and Cosmopolitan Frameworks. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 132-139.
5. [5]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 99-109.
6. [6]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 121-131.
7. [7]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 156-178.
8. [8]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 24-36.
9. [9]
  WANG Yun . Lu Xun‘s Two Stances on Judging Artistic Justice. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 131-141.
10. [10]
  Gao Xinmin , Hu Shuizhou . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(5): 25-35.
11. [11]
  Yuan KONG . A Critical Study on the “Oriental” Paradox of Western Universal Narrative. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 127-137.
12. [12]
  XIE Huayu . Predicaments of Divided Urban Governance and Their Overcoming. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 84-94.
13. [13]
  Jilin XU . The Historical World and Spiritual Ethos of the Radical Intellectuals in Late Qing. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 202-216.
14. [14]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 166-176.
15. [15]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(11): 49-56.
16. [16]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 5-18.
17. [17]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 112-121.
18. [18]
  TAO Nanying . Paradox in the Subjectivity Construction of Chinese Foreign-Related Legal Research and Its Transcendence. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 95-109.
19. [19]
  YU Jianxing . Beyond Technology Empowerment: How Can Governance Model Be Reshaped in Digital Reform. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 73-83.
20. [20]
  Chengcheng YE , Shiping TANG . A Comparative Modernization Study beyond the Great Diversion: History, Methodology and Theory in the Space-Time Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 77-86.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 598 Times PDF downloads: 7 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(7)
Abstract views(598)
HTML views(165)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Hanese-Thought Order and Ancient System of Gods

Shuifa HAN

Available Online: 2023-04-20

Abstract: The Hanese-thought order is a problematic, rich and fundamentally important area of research in the Hanese philosophy today, and it is also shown to be a fruitful method. Starting from this point and taking it as principle, the reexamination of ancient Hanese thought clarifies and recovers the spirit world of ancient Hanese, including its two main components, the system of gods and the system of mind. By analyzing and tracing the connections between the core words of the system of gods and their changes, the corresponding conceptual order and the changes of this order are sorted out, revealing the main structure of ancient Hanese thought and its major changes. Gu Jiegang denies that the system of gods was the fundamental factor and the main pillar of the social system throughout ancient Hanese thought because he lacks an effective method to clearly understand the binding nature of the Hanese-thought order; Yu Yingshi’s misjudgment of the relationship between humans and gods and the “eliminating the commonality between earth and heaven” in ancient Hanese is also due to his inappropriate methods and models that fail to comprehensively understand the direct connection between the word-thought-social order in ancient Hannese, and cannot pertinently grasp the ultimate intention of the systems of gods and mind in ancient Hanese.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Hanese-Thought Order and Ancient System of Gods

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Hanese-Thought Order and Ancient System of Gods

HTML

目录