Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 6
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Yibing ZHANG, Fugong ZHANG, Weiyu KONG and Ting WU. Economic Discourse and the Formation of Historical Materialism (Symposium)[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 5-10. shu

Economic Discourse and the Formation of Historical Materialism (Symposium)

  • Zhang Yibing holds that the Brussels Notes and Manchester Notes are Karl Marx’s important notes of his second systematic study on economics, and they are also the experiments of economic thought at the eve of the birth of historical materialism on a broad sense. But in the past days’ studies we did not lay sufficient importance on these texts, and the translation is also scarce. It is of important significance for understanding the formation of the broad-sense historical materialism through understanding these texts’ writing process and their theoretical connotation. Zhang Fugong proposes, through his study on Brussels Notes, that the historical revolution of the mode of production evinced by large-scale machine industry constituted one of the inner motives of Karl Marx’s turn from philosophical-humanistic discourse to the discourse of material production starting from objective reality. A deeper text-reading based on MEGA2 to Brussels Notes will be helpful for us to deeply understand the ideological origin and formation logic of Marx’s philosophical revolution. Kong Weiyu believes that Brussels Notes is the important spot of Marx’s discourse of production. Firstly, it announced his retreat from the discourse of labor and transfer to the discourse of production; Secondly, it made Marx to see the important function of material production as basis and premise; Thirdly, it constructed the foundation of methodology to penetrate the wholesome development of social history through relationship production in his broad-sense historical materialism. Wu Ting proposes that Marx in his Manchester Notes continuously concerned with the bourgeois material production process, and he acknowledged that, in the system of modern industry, the material production not only created a new historical relation between humans and the nature, but also created fundamental change in human social relation and its structure. Such a “production discourse” starting from reality put an end to the prior humanistic logic of value critique, and becomes an important clue to grasp Marx’s new source of world view.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 24-29.

    2. [2]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 11-17.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 25-38.

    4. [4]

      WANG Xinman . Italian Marxist Historicist Cultural Philosophy—— On the New Interpretation of Historical Materialism by Labriola, Mondolfo and Gramsci. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 44-52.

    5. [5]

      ZHANG Yibing . Capital:Towards Historical Materialism—— A Study of Forme,Fonction,Structure Dans Le Capital by Lefebvre. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(4): 66-79.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 18-23.

    7. [7]

      Yongle ZHANG . The Transoceanic Travelling of the Monroe Doctrine. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 105-125.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 5-12.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(01): 106-115.

    10. [10]

      Meng HOU . The Change of Political and Legal Discourse of New China. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 119-128.

    11. [11]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 38-48.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 25-33.

    13. [13]

      Bohai CHEN . Searching a Way in Constructing Contemporary Chinese Discourse in Literary Theory. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 142-147.

    14. [14]

      Yanhong LIU . To Promote the Development of the Discourse System of Criminal Law by Scientific Legislation. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 94-105.

    15. [15]

      Chenjun YOU . The Powers and Compound Functions of the Discourse Mode about Pettifoggers’ Retribution for Evildoing. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(3): 95-108.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 15-26.

    17. [17]

      Youmei LIJing GENG . The Paradigm of Knowledge Production in Chinese Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(6): 5-16.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 73-83.

    19. [19]

      . Industrial Policy, Firm Exit and Regional Production Efficiency Dynamics in China. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04): 33-45.

    20. [20]

      Fuwen TAO . National Memory Production and Politics of “Warship Island”. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 170-180.

Article Metrics

Article views: 361 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(361)
  • HTML views(37)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Economic Discourse and the Formation of Historical Materialism (Symposium)

        Abstract: Zhang Yibing holds that the Brussels Notes and Manchester Notes are Karl Marx’s important notes of his second systematic study on economics, and they are also the experiments of economic thought at the eve of the birth of historical materialism on a broad sense. But in the past days’ studies we did not lay sufficient importance on these texts, and the translation is also scarce. It is of important significance for understanding the formation of the broad-sense historical materialism through understanding these texts’ writing process and their theoretical connotation. Zhang Fugong proposes, through his study on Brussels Notes, that the historical revolution of the mode of production evinced by large-scale machine industry constituted one of the inner motives of Karl Marx’s turn from philosophical-humanistic discourse to the discourse of material production starting from objective reality. A deeper text-reading based on MEGA2 to Brussels Notes will be helpful for us to deeply understand the ideological origin and formation logic of Marx’s philosophical revolution. Kong Weiyu believes that Brussels Notes is the important spot of Marx’s discourse of production. Firstly, it announced his retreat from the discourse of labor and transfer to the discourse of production; Secondly, it made Marx to see the important function of material production as basis and premise; Thirdly, it constructed the foundation of methodology to penetrate the wholesome development of social history through relationship production in his broad-sense historical materialism. Wu Ting proposes that Marx in his Manchester Notes continuously concerned with the bourgeois material production process, and he acknowledged that, in the system of modern industry, the material production not only created a new historical relation between humans and the nature, but also created fundamental change in human social relation and its structure. Such a “production discourse” starting from reality put an end to the prior humanistic logic of value critique, and becomes an important clue to grasp Marx’s new source of world view.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return