激励与协调:央地关系的空间政治经济学
作者简介:陆铭,上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院特聘教授、中国发展研究院教授(上海 200030);钟世虎,上海国家会计学院现代产业发展研究中心副教授,上海交通大学中国发展研究院特聘研究员(上海 201702);雷镇环,上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院副教授(上海 200030)
基金项目:
本文为国家自然科学基金专项项目“超大规模市场的动态均衡理论与量化方法研究:结构转型与改革路径”(72342035)、国家自然科学基金青年项目“‘数字化转型悖论’的形成逻辑和实证检验”(72303149)的阶段性成果。
摘要: 以“长期、全局、多维”的高质量发展目标为参照系,可以系统分析中国央地关系中的结构性难题及其治理路径。地方政府追求短期、局部、单维目标的行为倾向,并非源于简单的政策执行偏差,而是内嵌于时间、空间、目标与责权四重结构性矛盾的理性抉择。地方竞争的个体理性行为在宏观层面可能引发资源空间错配、欠发达地区结构性困境、地区间产业政策趋同、道德风险扩散及重大生产力布局不畅等后果。化解央地结构性矛盾,需要从政绩观引领、差异化考核、财税体制改革、统一市场建设、事权配置优化、监督体系完善六个维度协同推进激励重构与约束强化。同时必须认识到,信息成本、道德风险、法治化困境与集分平衡问题构成了深化改革的四重难题。中国央地关系的优化,本质是在动态演进中不断校准地方政府行为,使其从追求“短期、局部、单维”增长的个体理性,收敛于国家“长期、全局、多维”发展的整体理性。
Incentives and Coordination: A Spatial Political Economics of Central-Local Relations
Abstract: Taking the “long-term,holistic,and multidimensional” goal of high-quality development as its normative framework,this paper systematically analyzes the structural challenges in China's central-local relations and their governance pathways.The behavioral tendency of local governments to pursue short-term,localized,and one-dimensional objectives is not merely a result of simple policy implementation deviations,but a rational choice embedded within four interrelated structural tensions:those of time,space,objectives,and the mismatch between responsibilities and financial resources.At the macro level,this rational individual behavior in local competition can lead to unintended consequences such as the spatial misallocation of resources,structural dilemmas in underdeveloped regions,convergence of regional industrial policies,the proliferation of moral hazard,and allocative inefficiencies of major productive forces.Resolving these structural contradictions requires a systematic reconstruction of incentives and constraints,synergistically promoted across six dimensions:guiding the philosophy of political achievement,implementing differentiated performance assessments,reforming the fiscal and taxation systems,building a unified national market,optimizing the allocation of administrative powers and responsibilities,and improving oversight systems.Concurrently,it is crucial to recognize that information costs,moral hazard,the rule-of-law dilemma,and the challenge of balancing centralization and decentralization constitute four fundamental hurdles in deepening reform.The optimization of central-local relations in China is,in essence,a dynamic process of continuously recalibrating local government behavior,steering it from an individual rationality that pursues “short-term,localized,and one-dimensional” growth toward an integrated rationality that aligns with the nation's “long-term,holistic,and multidimensional” development.