“绿色原则”司法适用的法理、风险与规制
作者简介:王灿发，中国政法大学教授（北京 100088）
作者简介:王雨彤，中国政法大学博士研究生（北京 100088）
摘要: “绿色原则”具有司法可适用性，能够扮演裁判依据角色对案件判决结果起到实质性作用。内容上反映出较高的要件事实可还原性、方法上对法律论证涵摄模式的适应以及功能上对法律规则局限性之弥补成为“绿色原则”作为裁判依据的正当性基础。但仍需认识到，作为一项法律原则，“绿色原则”的司法适用存在着较高的失范风险，一旦适用不当会危及私人自治的践行和破坏法的安定性。“绿色原则”的司法适用应当以谦抑性为基本理念，以“禁止向一般条款逃逸”为情境要求，以干预情形类型化为程度参照，以排除认定合同效力、判断合同解除权和推导公法责任为后果约束。
Research on the Jurisprudence, Risks and Regulation of Judicial Application of “Green Principle”
- Available Online:
2023-03-20
Abstract: The “green principle” is adjudicative and can play a substantial role in the outcome of a case as a norm of adjudication. The content reflects the high reducibility of the factual elements, the methodological adaptation to the legal argumentative model, and the function to compensate for the limitations of the legal rules become the basis for the judicial application of the “green principle”. However, it should be recognized that, as a legal principle, the judicial application of the “green principle” is subject to a high risk of misconduct, which may endanger the practice of private autonomy and undermine the stability of the law. The judicial application of the “green principle” should be based on the basic concept of modesty, the contextual requirement of “prohibition of escape to the general provisions”, the method of application by typology, and exclude the following legal consequences: determining the validity of the contract, determining whether the contract can be rescinded, and drawing public law liability.
点击查看大图
下载:
沪公网安备 31010102003103号