Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 6
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Xianliang XU. From “the Journey of Discovery of Consciousness” to “the Odyssey of Spirit”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 167-178. shu

From “the Journey of Discovery of Consciousness” to “the Odyssey of Spirit”

  • Bildung of the individual has been the core of German humanism since the Enlightenment. Under the basic framework of the concept of Enlightenment, the German Bildungsroman and Phenomenology of Spirit can be regarded as different representations of the same ideal: the former resorts to literary narration, while the latter relies on philosophical speculation. In the common context of the history of thought, the structural elements of the Bildungsroman are internalized into the content construction of Phenomenology of Spirit, which is presented as the process of self-education of individual consciousness through in pursuit of knowledge. Nevertheless, Hegel did not make it stay in the journey of consciousness but wanted it to prove itself as the deduction of a purely scientific concept. The spirit as a whole establishes the inevitability of education of individual consciousness through recollection and constitutes the unique speculative statement form of Phenomenology of Spirit. The process by which the Spirit as a concept examines its formation can be called “the Odyssey of Spirit”. In this way, Hegel established the method of self-construction of concept, surpassing the limitations of literary narration, thus testing the absolute consistency between the Bildung of the individual and the deduction of scientific concepts, and constructing the internal unity of Phenomenology of Spirit and Hegel’s system.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Liyuan ZHU . Re-examination of Hegel’s “The End of Art” in the Perspective of Hermeneutics. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 140-157.

    2. [2]

      Xiaoming WU . On Hegel’s Critique to Formalist Academy. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 5-16.

    3. [3]

      Xiaozhou HUANG . The Legacy of Hegel: On the Horizon of Gadamer’s Hermeneutics. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 31-44.

    4. [4]

      Xiangchen SUN . Hegel on the State and Religion. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 17-30.

    5. [5]

      Lixin HAN . The Contemporary Significance of Study on Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 5-16.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 35-45.

    7. [7]

      ZHONG Xia . The Ideological Thread of the Connection between Heidegger’s Phenomenology with Aesthetics. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(5): 157-167.

    8. [8]

      Jiaxin ZHOU . How did Young Marx Criticize Hegel. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 16-24.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 15-27.

    10. [10]

      Weizhuo ZHANG . The Ethical Implication of Community: Ferdinand Tönnies’ Synthesis of Hegel’s and Marx’s View of the Relationship between State and Society. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 134-145.

    11. [11]

      Dachun YANG . From Phenomenology of Spirituality to Phenomenology of Materiality. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 25-33.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 5-11.

    13. [13]

      HE Haoping . Phenomenological Approaches to Phenomenal Consciousness and Their Integration. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 28-38.

    14. [14]

      Hongwei YANGMei DONG . The Civilizing and Moralizing Policies of General Zuo Zongtang and His Hu’nan Army after the Post-Incidents Settlement in Northwest China. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 195-206.

    15. [15]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 29-39.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 27-31.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 12-16.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 5-30.

    19. [19]

      Chengzha CHEN . The Evolution of the Concept of Chinese Novels in the Perspective of “New Zixue”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(5): 125-135.

    20. [20]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 11-27.

Article Metrics

Article views: 397 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(397)
  • HTML views(50)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        From “the Journey of Discovery of Consciousness” to “the Odyssey of Spirit”

        Abstract: Bildung of the individual has been the core of German humanism since the Enlightenment. Under the basic framework of the concept of Enlightenment, the German Bildungsroman and Phenomenology of Spirit can be regarded as different representations of the same ideal: the former resorts to literary narration, while the latter relies on philosophical speculation. In the common context of the history of thought, the structural elements of the Bildungsroman are internalized into the content construction of Phenomenology of Spirit, which is presented as the process of self-education of individual consciousness through in pursuit of knowledge. Nevertheless, Hegel did not make it stay in the journey of consciousness but wanted it to prove itself as the deduction of a purely scientific concept. The spirit as a whole establishes the inevitability of education of individual consciousness through recollection and constitutes the unique speculative statement form of Phenomenology of Spirit. The process by which the Spirit as a concept examines its formation can be called “the Odyssey of Spirit”. In this way, Hegel established the method of self-construction of concept, surpassing the limitations of literary narration, thus testing the absolute consistency between the Bildung of the individual and the deduction of scientific concepts, and constructing the internal unity of Phenomenology of Spirit and Hegel’s system.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return