Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 6
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Ruicheng HUANG, Xin ZHANG and Gengli MAHE. Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 85-97. shu

Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being

  • Leo Strauss probably remains the single most influential and controversial writer of the history of political philosophy. The “enduring importance” of Strauss as a political philosopher does lie in his debates through his academic career with Heidegger, “the first philosopher” of the contemporary West. Today, the controversy surrounding Strauss’s political philosophy has already gone beyond the scope of Western academics and profoundly affected Chinese academics. China has not succumbed and will never “succumb to Western rationalism” as Strauss thinks: Strauss proposes to “begin to understand the possibility of a world religion”, and Heidegger advocates to prepare “for the great moment of the passing of the last god”, but the teaching of the ancient Chinese Sage Confucius is “human beings can promote the Tao, but not the Tao can promote human beings.”
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Qingjie WANG . Is Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology A Philosophical Anthropology?. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 5-12.

    2. [2]

      Naiqiao YANG . The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 162-176.

    3. [3]

      Bingquan WANG . On the Relationship between Political Philosophy and Political Science. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(12): 71-80.

    4. [4]

      Bingquan WANG . The Development of Contemporary Chinese Political Philosophy: Review and Prospect. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 64-77.

    5. [5]

      LI Dianlai . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 20-32.

    6. [6]

      Weimin MO . The Implications of Political Philosophy in Michel Foucault’s “Hospital Space” Thought. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(5): 15-23.

    7. [7]

      Liangkang NI . Husserl and Patocka’s Life-world. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 5-19.

    8. [8]

      Jitong LIU . The Social Construction of “Social Welfare Consensus” in China and the Goal of Modern Socialist Welfare State. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 73-84.

    9. [9]

      Weiping HE . Hermeneutical Circle and Meno’s Paradox. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 15-23, 39.

    10. [10]

      Chengfang ZHUODaping HU . Existence and Speed. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 22-30.

    11. [11]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(03): 30-39.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 51-57.

    13. [13]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 35-45.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 25-34.

    15. [15]

      ZHONG Xia . The Ideological Thread of the Connection between Heidegger’s Phenomenology with Aesthetics. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(5): 157-167.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(05): 27-33.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(11): 49-56.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(10): 180-184.

    19. [19]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 34-45.

    20. [20]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 111-123.

Article Metrics

Article views: 484 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(484)
  • HTML views(98)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being

        Abstract: Leo Strauss probably remains the single most influential and controversial writer of the history of political philosophy. The “enduring importance” of Strauss as a political philosopher does lie in his debates through his academic career with Heidegger, “the first philosopher” of the contemporary West. Today, the controversy surrounding Strauss’s political philosophy has already gone beyond the scope of Western academics and profoundly affected Chinese academics. China has not succumbed and will never “succumb to Western rationalism” as Strauss thinks: Strauss proposes to “begin to understand the possibility of a world religion”, and Heidegger advocates to prepare “for the great moment of the passing of the last god”, but the teaching of the ancient Chinese Sage Confucius is “human beings can promote the Tao, but not the Tao can promote human beings.”

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return