治标与治本之争:重探抗战时期的保障作家运动
The Controversies of Treating the Symptoms and the Basics: Revisiting the Writers’ Protection Movement during the Anti-Japanese War
-
摘要: 仔细爬梳抗战时期国统区保障作家运动的具体过程,可以确认,“文协”发起这一运动的初衷除了通常认为的经济因素,更重要的原因还在于左翼人士试图以此为契机,开展保障作家权益的社会运动。在“治标”与“治本”的争议中,“保障作家运动”最终以“保障作家生活运动”落地,反映出处于官方与民间中介位置的“文协”内部的微妙生态和“弱领导”的特征。这一运动使现代职业化作家群体浮出水面,受到社会各界前所未有的关注,在商业市场萎靡、稿费制度崩溃的情况下,如何为这一群体提供制度性保障的讨论由此展开,直至新中国成立后落实为以单位供给制为核心的保障体系,1940年代遗留下的作家管理和保障问题,自此走向新局面。Abstract: Carefully combing through the specific process of the movement to protect writers during the Anti-Japanese war, it can be confirmed that besides the economic factors which usually considered to be the initial reason for the Literary Association to initiate this movement, a more important reason is that the leftists tried to take this opportunity to carry out a social movement to protect the rights and interests of writers. In the controversy between treating the symptoms and treating the root causes, the Movement for Protecting Writers ended up as the movement for protecting writers basic life. This movement finally brought the group of modern professional writers to the surface, and received unprecedented attention of almost all social circles.
-
Key words:
- Literary Association /
- Movement to Protect Writers /
- Literary Prize Society /
- Lao She /
- Zhou Yang
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 670
- HTML全文浏览量: 82