中国地域文学史何以成学——从学术源起、历史演进到学理建构
作者简介:葛永海,浙江师范大学人文学院、浙江省方志文化研究与传承协同创新中心教授(浙江金华 321004);潘巨强,浙江师范大学人文学院博士研究生(浙江金华 321004)。
摘要: 中国地域文学史在古典时期形成了“一源双流”的演进格局:以“风骚”为宗,以地域诗文总集与地方史志为互补互鉴的文脉双轨。在“南北文学不同论”等理论观念推动下,地域文学史开启近代转型,1924年杨树荣发表的《潮州文学史》被视为现代意义上的第一部地域文学史。新中国成立尤其20世纪80年代以来,地域文学史逐渐形成撰述与出版热潮,表现出体量庞大、覆盖面广、层级丰富、视角多元等特点,同时亦面临理论凝滞、结构趋同、畛域模糊、地方夸饰等困境。通过学术总结与检讨,地域文学史成学的突破在于理论层面、路径层面和价值层面三个方向。从地域文学史走向地域文学史学,是学科发展和学理突破的必然,亦是现实驱动的必然。
Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction
Abstract: During the classical period,Chinese regional literary history evolved into a pattern characterized by “one origin and two streams”.Rooted in the canonization of The Classics and critique of the Sao Poetry,it developed along two parallel and complementary tracks:regional literary anthologies and local historical records.Since the modern era,the field began to transform under theoretical influences such as “ the theory of distinct northern and southern literatures”.Yang Shurong's A History of Chaozhou Literature published in 1924 is regarded as the first regional literary history in this time.Since the founding of the People's Republic of China,and particularly since the 1980s,regional literary history has gradually developed into a surge of writing and publishing,characterized by substantial volume,extensive coverage,rich hierarchical levels,and diverse perspectives.However,the discipline has long faced challenges including theoretical stagnation,structural homogeneity,blurred boundaries,and self-aggrandizement.Consciously integrating literary geography into its theoretical system and reconstructing its research paradigm—thereby establishing a spatiotemporal analytical framework—is key to overcoming these obstacles.At the methodological level,emphasis should be placed on interpreting key regional writers,analyzing critical regional texts,and constructing distinctive regional literary traditions.In terms of value orientation,efforts should be directed toward unearthing local literary documents,aesthetically reconstructing literary texts,and preserving regional cultural spirit.By systematically reviewing the academic origins and evolution of the field,critically reflecting on current challenges,and identifying future breakthroughs,the construction of a self-standing “Historiography of Regional Chinese Literature” is not only necessary but also crucial for dismantling the homogeneity of grand narratives in Chinese literary history and revitalizing the creative energy of regional literary traditions.