问题与愿景:中国刑法学转型发展的省思
作者简介:徐宏,华东政法大学刑事法学院副教授(上海200042)。
基金项目:
本文系教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“公正司法视域下罚金刑自由裁量的边界与程序控制研究”(23YJC820051)、贵州省高校人文社会科学研究项目资助“生成式人工智能时代网络空间安全问题研究”(2024RW290) 的阶段性成果
摘要: 以规范主义和科学主义为核心旨趣、以刑法文本解读为基本范式的教义刑法学,乃是以德国为代表的大陆法系刑法学知识的主流方法论。苏联刑法学和借鉴自苏联的新中国刑法学,在方法论层面追根溯源都是19世纪欧陆特别是德国刑法学的扬弃,属于教义刑法学知识谱系,因此在中国刑法学语境中,或许存在教义学深化的持续问题,但并不存在所谓教义学转型的特别问题。中国刑法学需要以知识涌现和变革推动转型升级,但这种转型不应当是唯一、排他的纯粹理性建构主义过程,而应当放大与开阔时空观念,既要在中国与世界之间顾盼,推动与全球多元刑事法治文明的交流互鉴,又要在传统与现实之间流连,体现对中华本土刑事法治文明的尊重赓续,以内生性与开放化兼具的代际整合姿态完成中国刑法学的自主知识体系建构和中国式现代化转型。
Problems and Visions:Reflections on the Transformation and Development of Chinese Criminal Law
Abstract: Doctrine of criminal law,which takes normalism and scientism as its core purview and the interpretation of criminal law text as its basic paradigm,is the mainstream methodology of criminal jurisprudence knowledge in the continental law system represented by Germany.Whether it is Soviet Union criminal law or China’s traditional criminal law inherited from the Soviet Union,still is the continuation of the knowledge of the German doctrine of criminal law in the nineteenth century if we trace the roots in technology and methodology.It belongs to the doctrinal criminal law knowledge spectrum.Therefore,in the context of Chinese criminal jurisprudence,there may be a continuing problem of doctrinal deepening,but there is no special problem of so-called doctrinal transformation.In the new era,Chinese criminal jurisprudence needs to be transformed and upgraded by knowledge emergence and reform,but this transformation should not be the only and exclusive process of pure rational constructivism,but should enlarge and broaden the concept of time and space,look between China and the world,promote exchanges and mutual learning with the global pluralistic criminal rule of law civilization,stay between tradition and reality,and reflect the continuous respect for the Chinese local criminal rule of law civilization,continue to complete the construction of the independent knowledge system of Chinese criminal law and the transformation of Chinese modernization in the intergenerational integration manner both endogeneity and openness.