宋明理学的三种知行观
作者简介:丁为祥,陕西师范大学哲学系教授(陕西西安 710119)
摘要: 一般说来,知行观属于功夫修养的范围,因而人们往往将其作为本体思想的一种落实与表现来把握。这当然有一定的道理。但根据儒家传统体与用、本体与功夫之间的互渗互证关系,不仅理学家关于体与本体的思想就表现在其功夫论中,而且从知行功夫的角度也可以逆向甚至更为具体地把握其本体思想。从这一视角出发,宋明知行观的探讨主要表现为程朱的知先行后、王阳明的知行合一以及王夫之的行先知后三种结论;而这三种不同的知行观,既代表着理学发展的三个阶段,同时也体现着理学发展的三个理论制高点,是理学沿着三个不同方向发展所得出的结论。至于其相互的批评、转进与分歧、演变,不仅代表着理学探讨之深入,同时也体现着其边界与底限意识。今天,反思其不同的制高点及其底限之间的互动关系,也是对宋明理学进行研究、总结并推陈出新的应有之义。
Three Ideas of Knowing and Practicing in Confucianism of Song and Ming Dynasties
- Available Online:
2019-03-01
Abstract: Generally speaking, the ideas of knowing and practicing belongs to the sphere of self-training, therefore, it is often considered as the exercise and the expression of ontological ideas. This is certainly reasonable. But, according to the relationship of mutual penetrating and mutual proving between ontology and apply in Confucian tradition, not only the ideas of Confucian scholars are expressed in their theory of effort, but also it is known in details inversely from the dimension of the effort of knowing and practicing. In this viewpoint, the probing of the ideas of knowing and practicing is chiefly expressed in knowing-firstly-and-practicing-secondly theory of Cheng Yi, Cheng Hao and Zhu Xi, in Knowing-and-practicing-as-one theory of Wang Yangming, and Practicing-firstly-and-knowing-secondly theory of Wang Fuzhi. Such three different ideas represent three stages of the development of Song and Ming Dynasty Confucianism and, at the same time, embodies three theoretical heights, and the conclusions from three directions. As for their mutual criticism, divergence and evolution, they represent the deepening of probing, as well as their boundary and limited consciousness. Today, in retrospecting the interaction of their different theoretical heights and limited consciousness, it is necessary to study, to sum up, and to weed through the old and bring forth the new in the studies of Confucianism of Song and Ming Dynasties.