Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 50 Issue 10
December 2018
Article Contents

Citation: Jianxun JI. A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 140-149. shu

A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature

  • The discipline of Chinese comparative literature has made great achievements in the past 40 years. However, recently comparative literature in China has a tendency to put influence studies and parallel studies into opposition. This has also objectively led to the often-encountered " mythicization of influence studies” and " demonization of parallel studies” and other negative reactions that undermine the academic credibility of comparative literature. Firstly, combining the history of Western comparative literature with the new trend of domestic comparative literature research, this paper sums up two kinds of bad symptoms accompanied by the development of Chinese comparative literature. Secondly, on the basis of discerning the relationship between influence studies and parallel studies, this paper further discusses several main research types of comparative literature and redefines two important concepts of " comparability” and " knowledge equipment” in comparative literature. Finally, the author tries to look forward to the third stage of global comparative literature. It shows that after 40 years of leap-forward development, compared with the vigorous development of comparative literature teaching and research practice, Chinese scholars in the construction of comparative literature methodology still have a long way to go.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      LI Shi YANG Gang . Capability Approach and Measures of Rural Development in China. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 94-101.

    2. [2]

      ZHOU Dongping LIU Andi . On the Discourse Construction and Creative Transformation of Headnotes in Traditional Chinese Law. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 12-18.

    3. [3]

      HUANG Jiangsu . A Study on the Relationship between Wang Fangren, Lu Xun, and the Closure of the Zhaohua Literature Society. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 179-189.

    4. [4]

      HUI Chunshou . The Rawls's Difference Principle and Its Interest of Emancipation. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 41-51.

    5. [5]

      HUANG Wei WANG Yang CHEN Zhao . Balancing Equality and Efficiency——The Incentive and Allocation Effects of the Charity Law. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 79-93.

    6. [6]

      WANG Yishuai . Reclaiming the Participatory Rights of the Public——An Analytical Framework of Holistic Collaborative Democracy for Public Legislative Participation in Mega-city. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 102-116.

    7. [7]

      HU Jie . Social Mentality: A Path of Writing and Interpreting the History of Group Spirit. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 144-154.

    8. [8]

      XU Songying HUANG Xiongying . Rationality, Balance, and Domination: The Meaning and Genealogy of “The State as Machine”. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 129-143.

    9. [9]

      GAN Shaoping . Naturalness and Autonomy: The Differentiation of Ethical Norm Generation. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 19-30.

    10. [10]

      ZHANG Qi . The Concept of Justice in Classical Economics from the Debates on Poor Laws. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 67-78.

    11. [11]

      XIA Yin . “Lisheng”, “Ergu” and “Manshu”: Three Figures Involved in the “Jingsheng” Incident. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 155-165.

    12. [12]

      LI Zhongmin ZHANG Jianguang . Descending to the Underworld and Ascending to Immortality: The Dual Imagination of the Afterlife as Seen in Han Dynasty Pictorial Bricks. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 190-202.

    13. [13]

      LI Lan . On Tao Menghe's Contribution to The New Youth——Important Details about the Division of The New Youth. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 166-178.

    14. [14]

      LUO Biliang . Leviathan: From Agriculture to Artificial Intelligence——Techno-Political Economy and Reflections on the Continuity of Human Civilization. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 52-66.

Article Metrics

Article views: 3786 Times PDF downloads: 12 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(12)
  • Abstract views(3786)
  • HTML views(407)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature

        Abstract: The discipline of Chinese comparative literature has made great achievements in the past 40 years. However, recently comparative literature in China has a tendency to put influence studies and parallel studies into opposition. This has also objectively led to the often-encountered " mythicization of influence studies” and " demonization of parallel studies” and other negative reactions that undermine the academic credibility of comparative literature. Firstly, combining the history of Western comparative literature with the new trend of domestic comparative literature research, this paper sums up two kinds of bad symptoms accompanied by the development of Chinese comparative literature. Secondly, on the basis of discerning the relationship between influence studies and parallel studies, this paper further discusses several main research types of comparative literature and redefines two important concepts of " comparability” and " knowledge equipment” in comparative literature. Finally, the author tries to look forward to the third stage of global comparative literature. It shows that after 40 years of leap-forward development, compared with the vigorous development of comparative literature teaching and research practice, Chinese scholars in the construction of comparative literature methodology still have a long way to go.

          HTML

        Relative (14)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return