Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 50 Issue 10
December 2018
Article Contents

Citation: Jianxun JI. A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 140-149. shu

A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature

  • The discipline of Chinese comparative literature has made great achievements in the past 40 years. However, recently comparative literature in China has a tendency to put influence studies and parallel studies into opposition. This has also objectively led to the often-encountered " mythicization of influence studies” and " demonization of parallel studies” and other negative reactions that undermine the academic credibility of comparative literature. Firstly, combining the history of Western comparative literature with the new trend of domestic comparative literature research, this paper sums up two kinds of bad symptoms accompanied by the development of Chinese comparative literature. Secondly, on the basis of discerning the relationship between influence studies and parallel studies, this paper further discusses several main research types of comparative literature and redefines two important concepts of " comparability” and " knowledge equipment” in comparative literature. Finally, the author tries to look forward to the third stage of global comparative literature. It shows that after 40 years of leap-forward development, compared with the vigorous development of comparative literature teaching and research practice, Chinese scholars in the construction of comparative literature methodology still have a long way to go.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Ning WANG . Toward a New Framework of International Comparative Literature: Chinese Scholars’ Contributions. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 144-154.

    2. [2]

      JI Jianxun . The Origins of Chinese Comparative Literature and Their Methodological Significance. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(1): 164-175.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 210-216.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 149-162.

    5. [5]

      HAN Shuifa . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(7): 5-24.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(03): 131-140.

    7. [7]

      Taihui GUO . Sources of Methodological Differentiation Within Historical Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 81-94.

    8. [8]

      WU Xinjun . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 162-167.

    9. [9]

      MA Lin . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(9): 35-43.

    10. [10]

      Wenjun NIU . The Clarification and Reconstruction of the Concept “Auslegung” in Contemporary Methodological Hermeneutics. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(12): 15-23, 33.

    11. [11]

      Yuhong HU . The Position, Origin and System of the Methodology of Jurisprudence. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 17-32.

    12. [12]

      Chengcheng YEShiping TANG . A Comparative Modernization Study beyond the Great Diversion: History, Methodology and Theory in the Space-Time Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 77-86.

    13. [13]

      Huifen GUO . A New Sight on the Study of Modern Chinese Literature. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 121-132, 141.

    14. [14]

      Xiuming WU . Eight Problems to be Faced in the Historicization of Contemporary Literature Studies. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 161-171.

    15. [15]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 209-216.

    16. [16]

      Gang XIAN . Schelling on the Origin and Nature of Mythology. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 18-26.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 177-178.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 117-124.

    19. [19]

      Weisheng XIAO . On the Evolution Logic and Reflection of Chinese Mainland Cultural Research during the 70 Years of the P.R.China. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 121-131, 171.

    20. [20]

      Jie YINYushuai ZHANG . On the Naturalized Tendency of the Research of Morality. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 31-39.

Article Metrics

Article views: 2892 Times PDF downloads: 12 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(12)
  • Abstract views(2892)
  • HTML views(340)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature

        Abstract: The discipline of Chinese comparative literature has made great achievements in the past 40 years. However, recently comparative literature in China has a tendency to put influence studies and parallel studies into opposition. This has also objectively led to the often-encountered " mythicization of influence studies” and " demonization of parallel studies” and other negative reactions that undermine the academic credibility of comparative literature. Firstly, combining the history of Western comparative literature with the new trend of domestic comparative literature research, this paper sums up two kinds of bad symptoms accompanied by the development of Chinese comparative literature. Secondly, on the basis of discerning the relationship between influence studies and parallel studies, this paper further discusses several main research types of comparative literature and redefines two important concepts of " comparability” and " knowledge equipment” in comparative literature. Finally, the author tries to look forward to the third stage of global comparative literature. It shows that after 40 years of leap-forward development, compared with the vigorous development of comparative literature teaching and research practice, Chinese scholars in the construction of comparative literature methodology still have a long way to go.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return