Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 52 Issue 11
December 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Wenfang YAO. The Representation of Social Integrity: The Productbility of Kahler’s “Theory”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 142-149. shu

The Representation of Social Integrity: The Productbility of Kahler’s “Theory”

  • Jonathan Keller has made several definitions about “theory” and the explanatory nature, by which the reflective and critical nature of “theory” is achieved precisely, is one of its characteristics. From Kahler’s point of view, cultural studies and “theory” are two interchangeable concepts, both originating from literary research but squeezing and rejecting it, which makes the transformation of methodology realized and interprets literature as a sign of social integrity. Therefore, the reading of literary objects has a series of distinctions of different types and different levels, such as poetic mode/hermeneutics mode, hermeneutics of restoration/hermeneutics of suspicion, and representational interpretation/symptomatic interpretation, etc. Through the clarification and collocation of these intricate and chaotic relationships, this article reveals that “theory”, as a new genre of humanities, has significant effects in promoting concept production, knowledge growth and academic construction.
  • 加载中

Article Metrics

Article views: 1629 Times PDF downloads: 8 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(8)
  • Abstract views(1629)
  • HTML views(280)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        The Representation of Social Integrity: The Productbility of Kahler’s “Theory”

        Abstract: Jonathan Keller has made several definitions about “theory” and the explanatory nature, by which the reflective and critical nature of “theory” is achieved precisely, is one of its characteristics. From Kahler’s point of view, cultural studies and “theory” are two interchangeable concepts, both originating from literary research but squeezing and rejecting it, which makes the transformation of methodology realized and interprets literature as a sign of social integrity. Therefore, the reading of literary objects has a series of distinctions of different types and different levels, such as poetic mode/hermeneutics mode, hermeneutics of restoration/hermeneutics of suspicion, and representational interpretation/symptomatic interpretation, etc. Through the clarification and collocation of these intricate and chaotic relationships, this article reveals that “theory”, as a new genre of humanities, has significant effects in promoting concept production, knowledge growth and academic construction.

          HTML

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return